35mm DA Ltd
Best regards, John
I've seen good reports about the 35mm macro (50mm equiv. on film). I've only used a 50mm and 100mm macros. I prefer the 50mm and have never had any problems blocking light. I doubt if another 15mm would make much difference. You probably need 100mm macros for insects. For stuff like flowers the smaller lens makes it easier to get underneath the flowers as long as you also have a right angle finder.
It was a bit warmer today and I noticed two very strange flowers growing out of some grass on my front lawn (probably grown from birdseed) I managed to grab a quick shot in case they are gone tomorrow. I was almost on the grass with the camera and the 50mm lens. They are only about 12mm long and the flowers actually upside down. Does any one know what they are?

shim


One type of Snowdrop


So they are

from because they're normally grown from bulbs? These must be from seed.
I'll have to see if I can keep them.
Thanks
shim
our front garden is one mass of white at the moment, my wife digs out loads to give away, but every year we have this display of white.


tomorrow to see if the same type are growing anywhere
else. Being bulbs they should be easy enough to move.
shim
K20D +smc PENTAX DA 35mm F2,8 Macro Limited
Iso 100, F8, Exp. 1/8 (levels, rezise, little sharp). My livingroom, windowlight.
Orchid!
When you need macro (maybe prtrait9, then take 100mm macro. When you need universal... more normal (landscapes, groups etc.), then take 35mm. Both objectives have high quality and worth every penny!
I have had my 35mm da since last summer and I think it is a cracker. I agree with John for bugs you need a little more reach (I use an old Tamron 90 2.5), but used with care insects and bugs can be caught ( I've put 2 pics on my portfolio recently) Its also a smashing walk about lens. BUY IT !!



Richard
K30, K200D, DA 18-55 mkII; DA 50-200; DA 35 macro Limited; DA 21 Limited
F 35-70; A 35-105/3.5; M 50/1.7;
PPG
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/35mm-DALimited-Macro-10038
Glyn
www.pentaxuser.co.uk/forum/topic/smc-DA-35mm-f28-Macro-Limited-9253
I was then thinking of buying a new lens to complete my Pentax K100D Super kit and I finally bought the 55-300.
Although I am aware the 100 mm Macro is more universally useful I am still thinking of purchasing the DA 35 Macro Ltd in a few months. What I like about it is that it seems to be a good walkabout lens with macro capability. You can shoot landscapes, architecture, flowers... It looks versatile to me and seems to correspond to my type of photography perfectly. Moreover the reviews are generally very good.
Benoît
RR
Member
South Wales, UK
My LBA is calling me toward a mid/wide prime or a Macro lens & this one is both.
My concerns are, it's not that fast (will it be much better at 2.8 than my Tamron 28-75?) & I'd imagine the macro working distance would be very low, would there be an issue with blocking subject light with the camera ?
My Flickr