PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
I know that we all fancy some longer Pentax lenses, but I think we can be sure that Pentax have done their sums on this and have decided where they can make the best progress. That doesn't seem to be with long lenses!

It looks like Sigma and any others will have to fill the gap for now.

Pentax could surprise us of course.

Comment by johnriley posted on My word..Canon owners want into the Pentax system.... at 01/02/2011 - 17:59

johnriley
The second image is slightly sharper.

Comment by johnriley posted on DA 18-135 at 01/02/2011 - 17:43

johnriley
Tungsten light lies outside the range of AWB. You need to set the Tungsten preset.

AWB simply corrects the coloour temperature based on integrating to a grey point, but that can mean the character of the light can be removed. I tend to use Daylight as my setting, to retain the natural colour of the light. The exceptions would be Tungsten and Fluorescent where these need to be set to give a reasonable colour to the light.

Comment by johnriley posted on KR Advice at 01/02/2011 - 15:01

johnriley
Actually there were far more than two models during the film era. Don't forget the ME Super, MX, MG, LX, 110, 645, 67, ME-F were all available pretty much at the same time. The "Pentax Cameras" brochures I have offer a full range of models.

When I bought my SP1000 the range also included the first three K models plus the medium format cameras. The screw thread lenses also continued to be available for some years after the bayonet mount was introduced.

Comment by johnriley posted on kx and k7 both officially discontinued? at 01/02/2011 - 14:58

johnriley
Quote:
By the way John, the jump from APS-C to Full Frame is approaching that of 35mm to 6*4.5 - not insignificant.
To be honest I never found the jump from 35mm to 645 to be enough. I should have bought a 67 to get the leap in quality I wanted.

APS-C to 645D is what I'm after and I suspect that it will be a big enough jump.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax D FA 645 25mm f/4 at 01/02/2011 - 13:06

johnriley
The most likely explanation is that the video card isn't set to two monitor operation. You'll get to this my right clicking the desktop or via Control Panel.

Comment by johnriley posted on Problems connecting and external monitor at 01/02/2011 - 13:04

johnriley
Going back to the 645 design, I have used these in the past and they are not that heavy or bulky compared to even a FF nikon or Canon DSLR.

The design is by its nature more "boxy" but it works very well and it is definitely suitable for use "in the field" as well as the studio.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax D FA 645 25mm f/4 at 01/02/2011 - 08:10

johnriley
It's another good question as an f1.2 lens might vignette by as much as 1EV.

Comment by johnriley posted on Difference between Pentax f/1.4 and f/1.7 at 31/01/2011 - 22:15

johnriley
I'm glad you mentioned metering dougf8 because the instruction manual does warn that exposure indication becomes inaccurate at certain aperture/shutterspeed/ISO settings.

One of these is when using the f1.2 lens which fails to meter correctly at f1.2 and I think also at f22. It's down to the limitation of the metering system.

Comment by johnriley posted on Difference between Pentax f/1.4 and f/1.7 at 31/01/2011 - 21:54

johnriley
A chargeback can be made under some circumstances. The buyer would have to check out the process.

Comment by johnriley posted on always read the small print at 31/01/2011 - 21:31

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo