PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
This is Pentax's low cost converter - four elements I think.

Comment by johnriley posted on Takumar A 2x converter at 18/07/2011 - 14:33

johnriley
claudefrog wrote:
Quote:
Have you considered constant lighting instead of flash?
The post relates to Strobist set-up, why would you want to use a constant light source outdoors when you have the sun?
Film-makers do this all the time to control the amount of light in the shadows. It's the same principle really, but we don't often see photographers using constant light sources outdoors. No reason why not though.

Comment by johnriley posted on Starter strobist setup at 18/07/2011 - 14:31

johnriley
Sometimes things don't like being plugged into a hub and if this is the case the instructions usually mention it.

I would only plug in what needs to be plugged in though as computers can be sensitive devices. It strikes me that plugging a 7 or 10 USB hub is not unlike overloading power sockets with four way adapters plugged into four way adapters. It doesn't sound like good practice.

Comment by johnriley posted on USB hub question at 18/07/2011 - 14:26

johnriley
I have to admit when I read the OP I was picturing one of these Nevada weddings with Elvis lookalikes. The question might have been if we get married in such a chapel who owns the rights to the photos taken.

As for Elvis, I saw him a couple of years ago in the town square in Ormskirk, judging some sort of competition of Elvis lookalikes. Bizarre.

Comment by johnriley posted on elvis presley at 18/07/2011 - 13:41

johnriley
There's plenty of humour about, but if someone asks a sensible question it helps if they get a sensible answer. Otherwise, they might just decide not to bother asking again.

Like all humour, it's all about timimg.

Comment by johnriley posted on Fisheye lenes at 18/07/2011 - 13:38

johnriley
eBay is an onvious choice. If you save a search for the item you want then as soon as somebody lists it you will receive an e-mail.

Comment by johnriley posted on Information at 18/07/2011 - 08:54

johnriley
My how time flies...

Comment by johnriley posted on Twitter spellings test at 17/07/2011 - 23:57

johnriley
I have had a couple of 50-200mm lenses and they were both fine.

I use the 55-300mm now simply because of its longer reach. The quality is excellent.

Comment by johnriley posted on DA 50-200 WR vs DA 55-300 at 17/07/2011 - 23:28

johnriley
Pentax have always made full frame fisheye lenses. We have to look to other makers for circular fisheye lenses.

Comment by johnriley posted on Fisheye lenes at 17/07/2011 - 23:26

johnriley
In the context of the auction description, the vendor do doubt means a full frame fisheye - one that has a diagonal view of 180 degrees. In other words, the image fills the frame, unlike a circular fisheye of up to 220 degrees where there is a circular image within the frame, surrounded by black.

Comment by johnriley posted on Fisheye lenes at 17/07/2011 - 22:45

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo