PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Perhaps the seller could explain a little more fully before we jump to conclusions.

Comment by johnriley posted on new Boxed metz 58af 1 flash gun at 05/09/2011 - 22:06

johnriley
I'd go for a second Pentax battery, others will opine that some cheaper ones are just as good.

Comment by johnriley posted on k-r replacement batteries? at 05/09/2011 - 21:19

johnriley
Yes, I missed that bit.

Comment by johnriley posted on Joined the K5 Club Yesterday, but .......... at 04/09/2011 - 23:45

johnriley
In that case David it looks as though the addition of a polariser has upset the optical configuration. I've never really used polarisers on very long lenses but I seem to recall that they are particularly suceptible to image degradation from filters. Perhaps try another polariser to see if that shows the same behaviour?

Comment by johnriley posted on Focus Issues with 55-300mm and Circular Polariser at 04/09/2011 - 22:45

johnriley
Because it loses two or three stops of light, the maximum aperture of the lens at longer focal lengths no longer enables the use of AF.

I'm not sure why you feel the need for a polariser on such a long lens?

Comment by johnriley posted on Focus Issues with 55-300mm and Circular Polariser at 04/09/2011 - 19:30

johnriley
Do you have the camera set to AF-C? This setting will cause it to continually focus.

Comment by johnriley posted on Joined the K5 Club Yesterday, but .......... at 04/09/2011 - 19:24

johnriley
There's got to be a reason for this. We have two K-5s and neither shows any tendency to gather dust, so where does the difference lie?

The only thing I can suggest from the scant information given is that maybe something in the lens is being drawn into the camera body when zooming. Or maybe there's some manufacturing debris in the body that keeps settling on the sensor. There shouldn't be, but there must be something going on to cause this.

Comment by johnriley posted on fed up at 03/09/2011 - 14:59

johnriley
Cosseted in its cosy world of bubble-wrap, the lens arrived today, safe and sound. It stretched, no doubt weary from its long journey, unzipped its coat and now resides happily on my shelf waiting for its first walk.

Looks good and I'll look forward to trying it out soon!

Comment by johnriley posted on For Sale: Tokina 80-400 AT-X at 03/09/2011 - 11:29

johnriley
Excellent, we'll look forward to seeing some shots soon!

Comment by johnriley posted on SMC Pentax-DA* 60-250mm f4 For Sale at 02/09/2011 - 21:42

johnriley
There seems to be a lot of mention of diffraction just lately. Diffraction sets in at smaller apertures, progressively reducing the resolution of the image. However, don't assume this is a major issue. With a good lens excellent results will be obtained down probably to f16 and f22 should be used if DOF is the main requirement. Yes, some sharpness will be lost, but it should still be good. It's good to have the choice.

With tiny sensors, they are often limted to f8 as beyond that quality drops off, but also because there's plenty of DOF anyway.

Comment by johnriley posted on The Kr. Better then an M4/3rd? at 02/09/2011 - 21:01

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo