All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Completely Dejected (auto focus K5) at 26/12/2011 - 23:04
If we subtract their 20 suggested error from the results and measure at 0 EV there's hardly any error at all. If we have a light level of 0.5 EV there isn't a problem.
Who routinely uses AF at such low light levels and why? Our eyes can't properly focus the camera when it's that dull....
Calibrating the AF in such dull light will not be accurate and will definitely lead to focusing errors.
Comment by johnriley posted on Completely Dejected (auto focus K5) at 26/12/2011 - 21:11
It's more usual to be taking photos in brighter light. Any errors can be corrected using QuickShift. In any event depth of field will cover most small errors.
Otherwise, if there's a real fault then returning under warranty seems to be the best option.
Comment by johnriley posted on Completely Dejected (auto focus K5) at 26/12/2011 - 19:06
If you're looking for something around the stated budget, check out for offers on the I-10, which is pretty good as well.
Comment by johnriley posted on Recommendations for a Pentax Compact around £60 at 26/12/2011 - 11:56
The one thing I dislike about getting new cameras is fitting the strap....it needs a quick release system like the Rollei TLRs used to have.
Comment by johnriley posted on K5 my new Christmas present at 24/12/2011 - 16:01
The EV range of the meter is something else entirely - that is the range of brightness levels that can be measured. A typical late film camera could usually cover EV 1-18, later ones still perhaps EV 0-21.
The K-5 AF system operates within EV -1 to 18 and the meter sensitivity seems to be EV 0-22. This is usually quoted with a 50mm f1.4 lens.
Comment by johnriley posted on help with EV range????? at 24/12/2011 - 10:57
I already wrote this post but for some reason it disappeared
Comment by johnriley posted on Newbie to this forum but a long time pentax user! at 24/12/2011 - 07:33
Comment by johnriley posted on Is there still a Pentax lens you covet ? at 23/12/2011 - 21:04
Comment by johnriley posted on Here we go! at 23/12/2011 - 20:45


The point is if there's no light, the image will be rubbish anyway, if there is light then it won't be EV0.5
It was noted in the article quoted that it would apply equally well to other marques, if there was a problem, although I haven't found a problem personally so it's hard to judge absolutely.