All Forum Comments
Comment by JAK posted on Rumoured 70-200mm f4 at 09/11/2018 - 23:04
stub wrote:
Actually Peter you dont when using a full frame lens.. Thats my point.. Well not on my K1 anyway..!!
Are you sure it is set to APS-C?Actually Peter you dont when using a full frame lens.. Thats my point.. Well not on my K1 anyway..!!
Viewfinder display in the Crop mode (APS-C image area)
In live view it sill show the cropped image filling the screen (presuming it is set to APS-C.)
http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/products/k-1/feature/04.html
Comment by JAK posted on A little help in wedding photography...? at 07/11/2018 - 22:26
[35mm full-frame]
Max. approx. 4.4 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous H): up to approx. 70 frames, RAW: up to approx. 17 frames
Max. approx. 3.0 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous M): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 20 frames
Max. approx. 0.7 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous L): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 100 frames
[APS-C size]
Max. approx. 6.5 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous H): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 50 frames
Max. approx. 3.0 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous M): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 70 frames
Max. approx. 1.0 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous L): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 100 frames
Max. approx. 4.4 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous H): up to approx. 70 frames, RAW: up to approx. 17 frames
Max. approx. 3.0 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous M): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 20 frames
Max. approx. 0.7 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous L): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 100 frames
[APS-C size]
Max. approx. 6.5 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous H): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 50 frames
Max. approx. 3.0 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous M): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 70 frames
Max. approx. 1.0 fps, JPEG ( L: ★★★ at Continuous L): up to approx. 100 frames, RAW: up to approx. 100 frames
Quote:
why is there black around the edges of my image
Never seen that! Which program do you use for PP?why is there black around the edges of my image
Comment by JAK posted on A little help in wedding photography...? at 07/11/2018 - 21:59
Quote:
If your in auto mode or FF and you switch to crop on the selection dial. Nothing changes..!!
No, if you set it to APS-C, that's what you'll get! Don't forget about the square format too. If you leave it in FF format, just crop it afterwards, the resolution won't change.If your in auto mode or FF and you switch to crop on the selection dial. Nothing changes..!!
Comment by JAK posted on A little help in wedding photography...? at 07/11/2018 - 17:39
johnriley wrote:
The K-1 is superb at low light photography, in fact one of the best I use.
But it isn't fair to say that the list provided had no images, because the technical shots were shown that could be compared to show the results at all ISO values.
It's also not fair to say that EPZ are "solely driven by commercial pressures and advertising." I do plenty of reviews for them and there is no pressure of any kind involved.
I've noticed as well it was a 2018 list, so the K-1 (released 2016) wouldn't be on it anyway, although arguably the K-1 II (released 201 should be. I presume the other cameras listed are all 2018 releases.
Well no, the first one was September 2015 and has been superceded.The K-1 is superb at low light photography, in fact one of the best I use.
But it isn't fair to say that the list provided had no images, because the technical shots were shown that could be compared to show the results at all ISO values.
It's also not fair to say that EPZ are "solely driven by commercial pressures and advertising." I do plenty of reviews for them and there is no pressure of any kind involved.
I've noticed as well it was a 2018 list, so the K-1 (released 2016) wouldn't be on it anyway, although arguably the K-1 II (released 201 should be. I presume the other cameras listed are all 2018 releases.
Could you have an inside word here?
Comment by JAK posted on My belief in Pentax at low light is shattered at 04/11/2018 - 16:35
FWIW the photograph they show at the start the article wasn't taken with any of those featured! link
Try this list instead: link
Try this list instead: link
Comment by JAK posted on My belief in Pentax at low light is shattered at 04/11/2018 - 15:24
I reckon the design was just too 'boxy' looking, Marc Newson or otherwise! I've still got mine even though it doesn't often get used. Anyhow, enjoy the Fuji.
Comment by JAK posted on K-30, K-01, DA21mm, DA40mm XS, DA18-55WR, PK-A 50mm 1.7 at 03/11/2018 - 13:36
Quote:
hopeful that we'll one day see an APS-C compact from Ricoh-Pentax that couples the amazing DA21mm to a GR-style body
Suppose the K-01 was the nearest - APS-C and a DA 21 could certainly be used. It could never be completely slim-line due to the lens to sensor distance requirement.hopeful that we'll one day see an APS-C compact from Ricoh-Pentax that couples the amazing DA21mm to a GR-style body
Comment by JAK posted on K-30, K-01, DA21mm, DA40mm XS, DA18-55WR, PK-A 50mm 1.7 at 03/11/2018 - 12:10
FWIW TfL provide guidance for photographers here:
https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/filming-and-photography/filming-and-photograph...
When to comes to commercial use or student photography it can be quite pricey.
In case that link above becomes broken the general gist for private photographers is,
"We get many requests from tourists, train enthusiasts, budding photographers and customers 'passing through' a station who may want to take photographs for their own personal use. We agree that this is acceptable, at the station's discretion, as long as additional camera equipment (including flash and tripods) is not used.
"However, images clearly promoting the London Underground brand/logos must not be published or broadcast without our permission ahead of time. Also, people filming or taking photographs for their own purposes on TfL's network are responsible for ensuring they comply with the requirements of privacy and data protection legislation. "
https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/filming-and-photography/filming-and-photograph...
When to comes to commercial use or student photography it can be quite pricey.
In case that link above becomes broken the general gist for private photographers is,
"We get many requests from tourists, train enthusiasts, budding photographers and customers 'passing through' a station who may want to take photographs for their own personal use. We agree that this is acceptable, at the station's discretion, as long as additional camera equipment (including flash and tripods) is not used.
"However, images clearly promoting the London Underground brand/logos must not be published or broadcast without our permission ahead of time. Also, people filming or taking photographs for their own purposes on TfL's network are responsible for ensuring they comply with the requirements of privacy and data protection legislation. "
Comment by JAK posted on Taking photos on London Underground? at 02/11/2018 - 14:38
swarf wrote:
but I must say that he doesn't seem too impressed by the idea!l
Perhaps he wasn't thrilled at the prospect of double maths first thing!but I must say that he doesn't seem too impressed by the idea!l
Comment by JAK posted on Getting Ripley wrapped up for school at 28/10/2018 - 21:43
No sign of a tripod mount, but the slower lenses didn't usually have one anyhow.
Tokina price: $899, Pentax price, your guess is as good as anyone else's! Weather sealing? If it has Pentax may use it as a justification to add a few more £££ to the list price.