All Forum Comments
Comment by JAK posted on TEST: smc Pentax DA 35mm Macro Limited on FULL FRAME at 22/03/2012 - 14:01
The flash could be useful for those macro shots though.
John
Comment by JAK posted on Recommend me a good 'auto' flash please at 22/03/2012 - 00:30
If both the landscape photo and the cloud photos were both my shots and I'd blended them myself I would be happier than having someone else's work involved.
Given that half the photo would be taken by someone else, I wonder who owns the copyright?
John
Comment by JAK posted on Smart Photo Editor at 21/03/2012 - 12:03
John K
Comment by JAK posted on K-01 user feedback at 21/03/2012 - 11:40
For more information, see the complete DxOMark results for the Pentax SMC PENTAX DA 14mm F2.8.
The test results are only as good as the person doing the test, and if the camera used has an issue, such as back focussing the results will all be skewed. I'm not saying that is the case but it is odd the results differ so much to other test results. However test results are not everything unless taking pictures of test charts is your thing!
In the 70mm test is the strange statement:
We would have liked a slightly larger aperture
John
Comment by JAK posted on DXO test some Pentax Lenses at 21/03/2012 - 10:46
Welcome to the forums by the way - just noticed these are your first posts on here.
If you show me some recent links to a virtually brand new K200D mint and boxed with lens that sold for around the £200 mark I may well reconsider. However if I saw a brand new one at that price I may even be tempted to buy another myself! The price is negotiable though, but I'm not in a rush to sell it just for the sake of it and if you prefer a more used one for less money then I understand.
The ones on eBay that I can see presently for sale are all over £300 with P&P and I doubt are in as good a condition.
The lens is the AL II version as supplied with the K200D (WR ones came later.)
The price I mentioned includes Royal Mail Special Delivery within the UK whereas the eBay ones seem to show P&P as an extra.
Anyway, show me what you've seen and I'll certainly have a think about it.
John
If any one else wishes to offer David a K200D as well, please do not hesitate.
Comment by JAK posted on Wanted: K200D at 20/03/2012 - 22:06
The going rate on a well known auction site looks to be around £300 plus, but no doubt will have had much more use than this one.
John
Comment by JAK posted on Wanted: K200D at 20/03/2012 - 18:16
Compare lens tests of each here:
http://www.photozone.de/pentax/463-pentax_15_4?start=1
http://www.photozone.de/pentax/133-pentax-da-12-24mm-f4-al-ed-if-review--test-re...
The DA 14mm would give you an extra stop but is much the same size and weight as the 12-24mm. I've recently added a 12-24mm and wondering if it is worth keeping the 14mm, especially as I have the 8-16mm and 10-20mm Sigmas. Too much choice! I find the results from the DA 12-24mm do have that "pixie dust" quality you mention.
John K
Comment by JAK posted on Would you swap a 12-24 for the DA15mm? at 20/03/2012 - 17:57
John
Comment by JAK posted on Francis Frith at 20/03/2012 - 17:40
An APS-C image is 23.4mm x 15.6mm (K-5, other cameras may vary slightly) i.e. the sensor is only 2/3 the size of a full frame one. So now a 35mm lens gives a smaller horizontal field of view of only approx 36 degrees.
You'll often hear the term crop factor, this refers to the equivalent focal length of a lens being used on a full frame camera. For a K-5 this factor is approx 1.5x. Therefore a 35mm lens used on an APS-C DSLR gives the same field of view as a 52.5mm lens on full frame camera.
John
Comment by JAK posted on something wide and fast? at 20/03/2012 - 13:01


John