JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
johnriley wrote:
The square images were the only ones that were judged.
Yes, it goes to show how the comp requirements are not always read or appreciated.

Comment by JAK posted on Discussion for Monthly Competition #36 - Geometry All Around Us at 23/06/2015 - 22:06

JAK
johnriley wrote:
Last month there were no out of date entries, but this month we seem to have slid into the abyss!
Actually there still is one showing for the May comp that was taken in April (according to the image's exif, but its date was modified to 1 May on the upload web page!.) The instructions for that comp did point out the May 2015 requirement (and that images had to be square though not all complied with that!)

Comment by JAK posted on Discussion for Monthly Competition #36 - Geometry All Around Us at 23/06/2015 - 19:56

JAK
The Competition Details page doesn't point out that shots have to be taken this month, just that the usual rules apply. I suppose some may get confused between the rules for the monthly/weekly comps. Perhaps it might help if there were dedicated pages with the rules for each comp that the judges could link to, or at least cut and paste what they are. JR used to trawl through and point out ineligible entries which may have drawn attention to the rules for others.

It's clever uploading picture taken in the future. I'd like to know the secret of time travel too.

Comment by JAK posted on Discussion for Monthly Competition #36 - Geometry All Around Us at 23/06/2015 - 19:44

JAK
Clearly release was imminent, so announcements made, but a problem was identified in the review copies. Surely it is better to get it right than to release a potential pup. Given the FF is not due until later, the delay doesn't really matter; we've enough lenses to be getting on with!

Comment by JAK posted on Delays at 21/06/2015 - 12:49

JAK
Gwyn wrote:
A quick update on this thread.

Windows 10 will be available free for those with Windows 7, 8 or 8.1 from July 29th. The offer is valid for one year.
My understanding is that the 10 update can only be applied to 7 and 8.1. An upgrade from 8 will require applying the 8 to 8.1 (free) update first.

My own view is to wait and see. Certainly will not be jumping straight in to upgrade on day one! If it isn't broken can't see the point of fixing it.

Comment by JAK posted on WIndows 10 at 03/06/2015 - 23:04

JAK
Try watching a tutorial or two such as this one from Adobe themselves:
https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/how-to/layer-basics-explained.html
Like most things, you don't become good at them without some practice first!

Comment by JAK posted on Superimposing new photo's onto old at 20/05/2015 - 15:16

JAK
womble wrote:
I don't have that camera but I find the menu thing very curious. I have often heard Pentax moaned at for the menus, but have always found them straightforward and easy to use compared to other makes I have used. Very odd.

The cameras we use at work are all by the same manufacturer but all different models, and they don't even have the on-off switch in the same place! The three Pentax dSLRs I have had all have it in the same place, around the shutter button just under your index finger. Works for me! I have barely touched the K-3 manual because 95% of things work just the same as the K10 and K20.

K.
Agree 100%

Comment by JAK posted on Your never believe it in this months practical photography has a review of the k-s2 at 17/05/2015 - 18:37

JAK
johnriley wrote:
I'd expect the advantage to be image quality as the Pentax converter is designed with such lenses specifically in mind.
Surely the Tamron one is too?? If not what is it designed for?

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax 1.4 rear converter comparison at 09/05/2015 - 23:11

JAK
Have you checked the entries submitted so far for the monthly? One was shot on a Sony and the other (according to the image exif) back in April despite a 1 May claim though it doesn't seem to load at all now!

Comment by JAK posted on Weekly #408 - Cars and Trucks - Discussion at 06/05/2015 - 11:33

JAK
Accurate focussing will be more critical on the FF body given the shallower depth of field, but I feel some need to go back to basics and use a film SLR before autofocus existed such as a Spotmatic, K or M series or equivalent. One tends to get the impression from posts here that certain photos would be impossible to obtain without cameras that have yet to be released. Clearly that isn't the case. The split prism focussing method of the older cameras seemed to make it easier to identify the point of accurate focussing and much simpler that trying to assign a zone or point on a small screen and hoping the camera's electronics will behave as intended. While one's doing that the subject's vanished!

Comment by JAK posted on About Pentax’s long standing AF issue at 28/04/2015 - 13:09

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo