JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
It looks like it might be more K1000 size, or perhaps approaching ME size, (Or Ricoh Singlex TLS size!) Almost certainly smaller than a K-3, closer to a K-S2.

Comment by JAK posted on New 'KP' more of a K5/K3 than an entry model at 24/01/2017 - 21:14

JAK
It's very, very much like this one, including that front dial:
Comment Image


Comment Image


Could even have been designed by the same person, if that is possible. Details of it here.

Comment by JAK posted on New 'KP' more of a K5/K3 than an entry model at 24/01/2017 - 21:05

JAK
Vic, I don't think PhotoMe shows it but ExifToolGUI does.
Alternatively, use this site to upload an image for it: https://www.camerashuttercount.com/

Comment by JAK posted on Actuation count??? at 24/01/2017 - 20:47

JAK
Algernon wrote:
It should work with the Ricoh 'P' lenses with the PIN then

--
It's probably essential to have that on the lenses for it. I've got one somewhere! That 20-40 Ltd must be a new version with the pin.

Comment by JAK posted on New 'KP' more of a K5/K3 than an entry model at 24/01/2017 - 19:08

JAK
I can see the similarities.
http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Ricoh_XR-P

Comment by JAK posted on New 'KP' more of a K5/K3 than an entry model at 24/01/2017 - 16:53

JAK
Simonmac wrote:

It looks like a baby K1/Kr hybrid to me!
Agreed.

Comment by JAK posted on New 'KP' more of a K5/K3 than an entry model at 24/01/2017 - 13:38

JAK
1stEverPentax wrote:
According to photorumors site the new Pentax 'KP' could be announced within a week or so and is said to be a K5/K3 class of camera rather than an entry level replacement. Compatible with a new DBG-7 grip apparently.
Err, no, Thursday, 26 January 2017, 07:00:00 (Tokyo time)
Photos here.

Comment by JAK posted on New 'KP' more of a K5/K3 than an entry model at 24/01/2017 - 12:27

JAK
Have you seen this review of it on YouTube?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcVP7kka4yc
(Less costly than hiring one!)

Comment by JAK posted on Wanted/hire Pentax 560mm at 22/01/2017 - 13:30

JAK
Taynuiltpixels wrote:
Wondering if anyone has a Pentax 560mm lens for sale or knows the closest place to me where I can hire one from. I am close to Oban so expect it might be Glasgow.
You could ask your local camera club perhaps: http://www.obanpc.co.uk/
Calument (Glasgow & Ediburgh etc.) do Pentax lens hire but doubt they'll do a 560. https://calumetrental.co.uk/pentax-1
Jessops, but not what you want: http://www.jessops.com/online.store/categories/Current%20Offers/rental/Pentax%20rental/Show.html
SRS do have one for hire. Are you rich? http://www.srsmicrosystems.co.uk/hire/

Comment by JAK posted on Wanted/hire Pentax 560mm at 21/01/2017 - 22:19

JAK
Taynuiltpixels wrote:
When using manual lenses is the reason for dialing in the FL of the lens only because of the need to optimise the oscillation of the SR function for that lens
Basically yes.
Taynuiltpixels wrote:
or is it needed for something else as well?
The exif setting displayed for the focal length might be wrong if it hasn't been set.
If it has been set and you haven't changed lenses in the mean time it should remember the setting used previously.
Taynuiltpixels wrote:
I am asking because sometimes when switching a manual lens under pressure ie for an opportune bird shot, saving time and not dialing in the len's FL would be beneficial. The SR would be switched off anyway as I've stopped trying to grab bird shots in poor light.
If SR is switched off it doesn't ask to set it, but the exif data might not be accurate.

Comment by JAK posted on Dialing in FL for manual lenses and SR at 21/01/2017 - 22:16

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo