ilovesaabs

Joined: 8th June 2012

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

ilovesaabs
Mike-P wrote:
Chris@SRSWATFORD wrote:
Well spotted Bill, was going to mention this later on this morning Mike - was rather busy yesterday!!
Busy is no excuse but as long as you haven't forgotten us

Still waiting for the start of the airshow season before I jump in with a K-3 but have to ask Chris, is the grip going to stay that price permanently? ... if not (and you remember) could you give us a warning before it goes back up.
Also watching the price on the grip...and the K-3

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Ex demo K3 £799 SRS at 10/04/2014 - 12:45

ilovesaabs
For me depends on where and when...

Although I live in the London, my folks live in the Vale of Clwyd and I visit on a regular basis....

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on North Wales meet? at 08/04/2014 - 15:29

ilovesaabs
Two words.........

Superb lens!

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on In defence of the DA* 16-50 at 08/04/2014 - 13:45

ilovesaabs
I have the 16-50, 60-250 and 300...

Both the zooms have had failed SDM, the 300 sulks from lack of use. When the zooms came back from JSPS they went from being very good to absolutely superb. Definitely worth the investment.

Would I buy the 50-135? No, I have primes that cover that range

(I also have primes that cover much of the 16-50 range also:blush

Would I buy the 55? Don't think so, but occasionally tempted. I have 2 50s that are used infrequently.

Would I buy the 200? As an FA* yes, but also get an FA*70-200.

The 60-250 was bought to replace 2 lenses - the Sigma EX - rationalisation of kit.

Would be nice for Pentax to bring out a longer DA* zoom

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Da* lenses at 08/04/2014 - 13:38

ilovesaabs
Only cosmetically...other than that I believe they are the same. I have the SA12-24 - I like to emphasise the Schneider Kreuznach branding myself.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Samsung lenses - are they exactly the same as Pentax? at 07/04/2014 - 10:31

ilovesaabs
You're building a nice little collection of F's there Tony

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on FS: Pentax F 50mm 1.7 - Excellent at 03/04/2014 - 15:41

ilovesaabs
And here's me hoping that the FF body comes in the Z-1 body

:hoping:

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Pentax Z coming soon? at 03/04/2014 - 13:18

ilovesaabs
Jonathan-Mac wrote:
It's due to cost. They're not using mechanical aperture links for other mounts so they have to manufacture parts specifically for Pentax.

I'm not familiar with it, but I'd imagine that the Nikon F mount would also use a mechanical link, due to it's age.
mechanical on the older bodies, but purely electrical on the cheaper bodies - AFAIK D3*00 and D5*00 won't work with older lenses whatever the brand.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Sigma - Why so few Pentax lenses - Answer at 03/04/2014 - 13:15

ilovesaabs
Hi Jemma,

I have a K-5 that ticks your boxes (I think it's less than 15K), but if I sell it I would rather sell it with the OEM Pentax grip.

Regards

Peter

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Wanted K-5 or K-30 body at 28/03/2014 - 18:57

ilovesaabs
Interesting conundrum..

A photo taken on a Sony?, given that the majority of Pentax DSLR's have used Sony Sensors (bar the K20D/K-7) slightly modified for use in pentax there is 'some' relationship there.....

Photos taken with film for uploading to PU, AFAIK Pentax or its parent companies have not made scanners, and there is no way we can prove the photo was taken on a Pentax camera..

I do support the notion of discussing the pros and cons between Pentax products and their competitors as the last thing Ricoh would find useful would be a brand-specific site full of happy clappers.

Comment by ilovesaabs posted on Protocol at 28/03/2014 - 11:37

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo