Theye only too dark if there are no/very few highlights
I would say they were fine - theres no point in trying to make an overcast sky look like one big blown out highlight anyway.

The last, although dark in places, is well composed and very nice.

The vignetting on the first on the lower left is distracting on screen (though I imagine not so in print)

Otherwise, nice work.

If you just need the layers, try saving in TIFF - it might be smaller
HTH
Rob.

And as martin said, compressing to RAW or ZIP would also decrease image size, maybe 1mb or 2.

Well then he got caught in the act!

This is why Canon users dont get the shots
Hahah.




Well, I found it funny.
I think its a Canon lens at least, sorry if I'm wrong, I just saw the image and found it funny

*applauds*

Just you, mine works fine when I wiggle it

I wouldnt worry however
SR is going to be useless past 1"

To get a 6mp image out of it, good enough for printing however, the sensor would have to be ridiculously big!

Think on the terms of, large format version of a digital camera, increased in size!

I think you're right.
It seems to me as if the sensor is split if you like, and the image is recorded well, quite a few times - the quality of the images on the refocus website are very low res, low quality, and none of them sharp

It doesnt really interest me if im honest, I dont see the problem with focusing, especially when its not even manual.

Oh, and good luck when it does come out carrying round memory cards with you - if you can store about 150 RAWs on a 2GB card, then you wont be able to store many refocus pictures

Just to let you know, the program PTlens has a database of lenses that it can automatically sort out distortion for, whether it be barrel, pincushion, or a combination (moustache; as in the sigma)