Hardgravity

Joined: 7th August 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Hardgravity
Oh if only we could!

Comment by Hardgravity posted on funny sign at 11/02/2010 - 22:18

Hardgravity
PM sent

Comment by Hardgravity posted on Freebie Spotmatic at 11/02/2010 - 18:23

Hardgravity
Reuben0 wrote:
mph555l wrote:
It is a little gem.
Agreed, I don't know why everyone is so down on it :

I used one on my MX for years as a lightweight travel combo and took some of my favourite shots with it.

I only retired the 40 when Pentax brought out the 43 Ltd

R
I think the problem with the 40 is the over the top price and very variable quality of the lenses on offer.

I tried one, didn't like it and sold it.

I may try another if the price was right, but at current rates that's going to be a long way off!

Comment by Hardgravity posted on Pentax-M 40mm 2.8 pancake lens at 10/02/2010 - 12:41

Hardgravity
I wasn't getting at Emiliaarts in my earlier post!

Only at the fact that the 40 wasn't, as everybody on ebay seems to think, a rare lens!

In the past I have bought from them, a couple of M series manuals, and have no complaint as to there service or description.
Having said that the prices are top end on most of their listings, I must try an offer next time...

Comment by Hardgravity posted on Pentax-M 40mm 2.8 pancake lens at 09/02/2010 - 20:49

Hardgravity
No 'A' version, just the 'M' and current DA ones, as far as I know.

I see that emeliaarts are selling no less than 5 of these 'rare' lenses, need I say more!

When Womble sees this thread he'll come up with a current value.

Comment by Hardgravity posted on Pentax-M 40mm 2.8 pancake lens at 09/02/2010 - 13:13

Hardgravity
Apart from the smaller size I found nothing remarkable about the 40 I had, in fact I sold it for only £46!

I feel the lens is over rated and over priced, I prefer either of the 50s to the 40.

But that's just my view, personally I wouldn't pay more than £50 for one, they're like buses, if you miss one another will be along soon.

Comment by Hardgravity posted on Pentax-M 40mm 2.8 pancake lens at 09/02/2010 - 13:09

Hardgravity
It's already been said in the earlier posts, Pentax build and image quality is much better than the cheaper Canon lenses.

I keep seeing adaptors to use M42 and K mount lenses on Canon and Nion bodies.

If the glass was crass would these exist?

Comment by Hardgravity posted on Price depression at 09/02/2010 - 08:17

Hardgravity
Funny how topics wander off piste, so to speak.

Thanks to all for the (interesting?) window into your lives.

Oh and don't forget to add your location....

Comment by Hardgravity posted on Where in the world are you? at 08/02/2010 - 17:38

Hardgravity
Have you tried a 2x adaptor with this lens?

Comment by Hardgravity posted on Pentax 2000/13.5 Reflex at 08/02/2010 - 06:51

Hardgravity
Quote:
This is the cheaper L version, which doesn't have a hood (or case) supplied - and the construction isn't as good as the other version
Optically it's the same as the standard 55-300, the main difference is the mount is plastic not metal, it comes without a lens hood and is supplied with the K-x kit.

In all other respects it performs just as well as a standard DA 55-300.

Comment by Hardgravity posted on FS: Pentax SMC DA-L 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED at 06/02/2010 - 19:09

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo