Comments made by gregmoll - Page 20

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

That looks like a fantastic application, if one goes to the examples page link and see what it does, it sells it self.

Check the Fish Eye correction.

Now to play
Thanks again
Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Purple fringing and Elements 6 at 21/02/2010 - 08:28

Thanks to both you, I thought that I'd read that the RAW converter as implemented in Elements was a crippled version.

I will search for PTLens.

Thanks,
Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Purple fringing and Elements 6 at 21/02/2010 - 08:09

Thanks,
I use Photo Shop RAW with Elements 6, could you give me brief explanation as to how one corrects PF in a RAW file.:
Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Purple fringing and Elements 6 at 21/02/2010 - 07:34

Hi,

Having done the mandatory search and not finding what I want, can anyone point me to a Add-On for Elements 6 which will eliminate "Purple Fringing"
Thanks
Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Purple fringing and Elements 6 at 21/02/2010 - 05:16

-
It's fitted now BUT i have dust on my Sensor that compressed air will not move any advice welcome
James

I think that you are most likely to have dust on the top surface of the new focus screen which will not be removed by compressed air. Can you see the dust through through the view finder?

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on Repacement Focus Screen at 20/02/2010 - 17:41

BTW, we are still on topic aren't we, it is headed "My first primes on digital" and this lens is as good a start as any isn't it :

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on My first primes on digital at 20/02/2010 - 05:04

It's a pity that the price is so high as I would be prepared to take a chance that the fittings from my K1000mm and K500mm would work, the connection looks identical. Do you think he would accept an offer of $900

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on My first primes on digital at 19/02/2010 - 23:01

I demanded a YES or NO answer as to whether or not the missing section was included and he replied "NOT"

He may well have some non standard adaptor but not the original Pentax fitting.

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on My first primes on digital at 19/02/2010 - 07:57

I asked the seller a question,

Dear foto-hobby,
Hi,
Do you have the missing rear section of the lens with the Pentax bayonet mounts on it.
Greg

and here is his reply, which I do not understand but I think he is being a bit devious what.

hi
you need to what camera notes such you will get
jolanta - foto-hobby

Comment by gregmoll posted on My first primes on digital at 19/02/2010 - 06:40

hefty1 wrote:

womble wrote:
Mind you, I doubt I'll find a copy of the 2000mm lens.

You probably won't want to look at this link then...

Looking at the photo of the lens it is not complete as it is missing the removable rear section of the lens with the bayonet fitting. It appears to be the same construction as the K1000 and K500mm lens, a couple of which have been sold minus this essential part, much to the purchasers surprise.

Maybe that's why he refers to "Pentax Canon Eos Nikon".

Greg

Comment by gregmoll posted on My first primes on digital at 19/02/2010 - 06:09

Proudly supporting Pentax User

gregmoll

All Forum Comments

All Forum Comments

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Proudly supporting Pentax User