All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on MZ-S at 18/10/2005 - 14:15
In Av mode on the MZ-S you set the aperture on the body, just as you would on the Z1-P, surely. What's the problem?
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on MZ-S at 17/10/2005 - 16:07
The solution is to buy a card reader. The USB cable and the download software can then be thrown away. You won't need them again, even for firmware upgrades. They can be done more effectively using the memory card.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on *1stDS / Windows XP problem at 15/10/2005 - 12:50
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Conspiracy Theory at 14/10/2005 - 00:50
Cautious people slap cheap filters on their lenses to protect them. I prefer to take a little care and get the full benefit of my expensive glass.
You can apparently stub a cigarette out on a Pentax lens without damaging the coating. I haven't tried it myself.
With film, as JR says, there are some occasions when filters are necessary, but with digital there are very few. The only time I would contemplate a filter with digital would be shooting landscapes in hazy conditions, but a better bet, if practicable, would be to come back at a less hazy time. Lens coatings are not designed to remove ultra-violet.
George
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Filters & Light Refraction at 13/10/2005 - 00:05
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Filters & Light Refraction at 12/10/2005 - 22:13
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax/Samsung tie-up at 18/10/2005 - 22:08
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax/Samsung tie-up at 16/10/2005 - 22:11
I am sure Pentax will retain the name. I would expect to see Samsung cameras with Pentax lenses on them, and perhaps some shared bodies (with minor differences) being sold under both names.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax/Samsung tie-up at 12/10/2005 - 11:02
G
(Just joking, Kim!)
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Fungus - latest thoughts? at 16/10/2005 - 23:53


G