All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Help please - posting images at 11/02/2006 - 21:17
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Using multiple AF400FTZ's at 16/02/2006 - 11:01
The 5P cables let the guns do everything that they can do when mounted on the hotshoe, so you should theoretically get contrast control using a couple of 500s connected by 5P cables.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Using multiple AF400FTZ's at 10/02/2006 - 16:39
For the DSLRs, the Adapter Fg is recommended in the manual, as that will enable the RTF to work. However, the Fg doesn't have a hotshoe on top, so won't allow stacking. If you already have the F (with hotshoe on top), then either an F or an Fg can go on the top of the pile.
The useful thing about the 400 flashguns is that they have their own 5P socket, so don't need an off-camera adapter.
BUT, you might well find that using manual flash rather than TTL will give you more control.
If cash is a consideration, the AF240FT also has a 5P socket, and is quite powerful enough, though it has a fixed head which limits flexibility.
Also consider a cheap slave trigger if you are prepared to use manual. In fact, do give manual mode your consideration. For your needs, it is the option I personally would prefer.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Using multiple AF400FTZ's at 10/02/2006 - 12:31
And with a few inaccuracies that seem to indicate that Ivor probably didn't use Pentax...
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Just curious at 15/02/2006 - 00:20
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7587172963&fromMake...
In the event, the seller got a well-deserved £1.20 (plus a little more because he cheated on postage).
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Just curious at 12/02/2006 - 14:19
It's an object lesson to the perpetrators of the more usual:
For sale: Petnax Ashi camara with lense £200 (NR)
i no nothinn bout camras but this looks in good condition but sold as seen coz i no nothin bout camrs im sellin it for my dad who passd away last night
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Just curious at 10/02/2006 - 12:12
Well, last night I noticed that the gold lettering on the sign was edged with dark red. This was what I thought was CA on my trusty old M 400mm.
So, it was nothing of the kind. The lens is absolved of all guilt, and I humbly apologise for suggesting it was anything other than optically damn near perfect.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on macro lens for ist DS at 17/04/2006 - 01:23
I suspect you are right.
Incidentally, this lens is an example of how best to use (some) K and M lenses on a DSLR.
I just leave it on f5.6 all the time, and shoot in Av mode.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on macro lens for ist DS at 11/02/2006 - 22:52
It performs well enough most of the time, but give it some extreme light conditions, like the reflection off this pub sign, and the CA goes wild.

When the light isn't too contrasty, it's fine:

So my question is, why is it that this lens performs badly on digital, given that the rear element is so far from the sensor that the light path must be almost vertical?
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on macro lens for ist DS at 11/02/2006 - 22:02


<img src="http://www.polmed.co.uk/pics/IMGP6345.jpg" width="1024" height="769" border="0">
G