All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax 1.3 Sensor... at 27/02/2007 - 23:10
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on My first Pro Shoot with K10D at 27/02/2007 - 23:12
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Dental Macro at 08/03/2007 - 12:17
You probably won't believe this, but your new camera actually contains a very accurate built-in spot-meter.
Dan
I also question the wisdom of buying a highly modern camera and using it with lenses from a completely different era. Why make life difficult? I'm not in favour of self-flagellation.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Got it at LAST! at 01/03/2007 - 23:35
II shall use it on manual with screw lenses like my SV Pentax and my Weston Meter.
Have you tried towing your car with a horse? Much easier than learning how to drive.
G
PS: You probably won't believe this, but your new camera actually contains a very accurate built-in spot-meter.
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Got it at LAST! at 28/02/2007 - 23:38
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Pentax FF future made clear at 22/02/2007 - 22:57
George Lazarette wrote:
I've just put a deposit on the 50-135 lens, when I meant to order the 16-50. It's not my day. Now to email Chris.
Chris
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on DA* Lens information for the first two but not the 60-250mm at 21/04/2007 - 23:44
This was one of the reasons behind my recent sell-off. Unfortunately, all the talk about K10D problems with M lenses has dampened enthusiasm for those.
I still can't make up my mind whether or not to sell my MZ-S and most of the A, F & FA lenses I have and just go for the new range of * zooms. I'll keep my three FA Limited's for now too.
DA 16-50 general purpose
FA 31 superb normal for digital
K 50 1.2 nostalgia
F 50 1.4 super short tele
FA 77 best lens ever made (IMHO)
FA 100 2.8 macro
F 70-210 very good tele zoom
F* 300 4.5 lovely longish tele
M 400 5.6 don't use this length enough to justify an AF (or even A) version, but it's nice to have a 400 available in the cupboard
1.7 TC
Aside from the first, which I don't have yet, the rest are all dear to my heart and will probably never be sold. Especially given the trend towards slightly slower primes.
I take JR's point about zooms being so good nowadays that he hardly ever uses a prime, and the only primes I am keeping are of the highest quality.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on DA* Lens information for the first two but not the 60-250mm at 21/04/2007 - 19:32
I've just put a deposit on the 50-135 lens, when I meant to order the 16-50. It's not my day. Now to email Chris.
I'm sure Chris will be understanding.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on DA* Lens information for the first two but not the 60-250mm at 21/04/2007 - 18:54
George,
The 300mm and 60-250mm are 1:4 lenses, not 1:1.4.
Good news though, could be an expensive year
I've just put a deposit on the 50-135 lens, when I meant to order the 16-50. It's not my day. Now to email Chris.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on DA* Lens information for the first two but not the 60-250mm at 21/04/2007 - 18:45


Not applicable.
Not much.
Not at all.
Not likely.
G
(The difference between 1.5 and 1.3 is not significant, in my view.)