George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
Quote:
................. and there has never been any viruses or nasties on it .
I can just imagine the next post we will get from you on the subject of computers.

In an effort to pre-empt it, I proffer this:

http://free.grisoft.com/

Let's hope it works on ME.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on A way around it ......... at 14/11/2007 - 00:48

George Lazarette
For goodness sake, Peter, Windows ME is ancient, and so, no doubt, is the computer you are using it on.

If you are going to use a digital camera, you need computer software and hardware that were designed for it. You will find your digital experience is improved enormously if you view and edit your pics on a 21st Century computer.

What you are doing is like entering the Tour de France on a Penny Farthing.

It's not as though computers are expensive any more.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on A way around it ......... at 13/11/2007 - 14:56

George Lazarette
"I'd be interested in anything accessible from South West London."

"And I'd be interested in anything accessible from Essex - London or anywhere not too far from the M25 really."

Piccadilly Circus?

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on South and/or London Group? at 13/11/2007 - 15:09

George Lazarette
Quote:
Does this mean Pentax is guilty of illegal import/exportation of wldlife?
Could be a plot. I suspect Dr Fu Manchu. Admittedly he was Chinese, but that's just a detail.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on bugs in viewfinder at 18/11/2007 - 13:22

George Lazarette
Street photography is the purlieu of Leica users, most notably HCB. Another of the invisible bretheren, David Douglas Duncan, was famous for his advice on how to do it:

"Get close. Then get closer."

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Discussion: Weekly Competition #19 The Monochrome Landscape at 20/11/2007 - 19:19

George Lazarette
Quote:
.............. and John and George rightly tear into me, leaving me mauled, yet strangely invigorated.
Masochist.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Discussion: Weekly Competition #19 The Monochrome Landscape at 17/11/2007 - 19:40

George Lazarette
Quote:
I am somewhat surprised (and disappointed) at the number of 'photoshopped' entries, some are obvious but not mentioned, others are mentioned but not obvious (to me anyway).

is this competition for the 'final image' regardless of how achieved, or is it to be an image subjected only to minor post processing?

I ask because I can get some wonderful skies off the web to spice up some of my mundane photo's. or I can get some excellent grand canyon shots to go with my moody skies.

yours devils advocatly,
This is the great question. Where does one draw the line between "correcting" a few little imperfections, and creating a whole new image based on the orginal photo?

I'm with you; I don't like too much manipulation, and I'm still trying to find a precise definition that separates what I call a photograph (a picture that is essentially produced by a camera) and an "image", which owes more to a computer than to photography.

We've passed beyond "Is film dead?" and "Is film better or worse than digital?". But "When is a photo not a photo?" will be with us for a long time to come.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Discussion: Weekly Competition #19 The Monochrome Landscape at 14/11/2007 - 19:14

George Lazarette
Quote:

There is another photography forum where most of the 'critique' consists of little more than 'nice shot', and it drives me mad. I've finally managed to stop reading it, and even deleted my internet browser bookmark to the site.
Fair enough, but there are also times when it's nice to know that something you have produced has made a positive impression.

When people just post a picture, without specifically asking for criticism, then I assume that they are not averse to receiving a little praise. So (if it's deserved) I am happy to give it to them. Such a case was my response to a recent pic of Clarky's.

But I agree that non-stop, fawning, platitudes can be rather wearying.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Weekly Competition #19 The Monochrome Landscape at 22/11/2007 - 18:34

George Lazarette
Quote:
johnriley wrote:
Interesting that no-one opted for the human landscape or macro landscape.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is the human landscape?
Spencer Tunick

http://www.i-20.com/artist.php?artist_id=19

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Weekly Competition #19 The Monochrome Landscape at 21/11/2007 - 19:27

George Lazarette
Quote:

It's quite interesting that some of us want to be bound by more rules, whereas the competition is designed to allow our imaginations full rein without too much hinderance. I think we have enough rules and regulations in life, but suggestions for new rules can always be posted...
Quite agree, but if a winner wants to impose a rule for that particular week, why not? I think it would add interest and variety.

After all, setting "monochrome" landscape is imposing a rule on top of the subject (the landscape).

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Weekly Competition #19 The Monochrome Landscape at 21/11/2007 - 10:02

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo