All Forum Comments
Comment by George Lazarette posted on 2 x Converter at 23/02/2008 - 18:51
George,
Your 240Z surely elliminates the preflash that you would get from the pop-up PTTL flash. Would that preflash not trigger your slaves to fully discharge (assuming they are set to 100% power manually) rendering them inoperable at the time the pop-up fires as a main flash and the shutter is open?
I can understand that the slaves will not be fully discharged during preflash if they are set to auto and the flash to subject distance is not too great.
Regards,
As I don't have a K100D, I can't comment on what is happening with Terry's camera. When I contradicted Terry, I meant that the K100D can't do wireless flash. What is actually happening, I don't know, but judging by his pictures it seems to work.
I have just tried using the RTF (retractable flash) on my K10D to trigger an AF-500FTZ. At normal flash sync speed it doesn't work, but at 1/50 it does. So perhaps Terry is using a slow shutter speed.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Very confused.. at 25/02/2008 - 00:38
But you are quite right to say that you can trigger the 360's light sensor with the K100D's pop-up flash. I do the same with my K10D and two remote AF-500FTZs, although I use an AF-240Z on the camera, pointing vertically, rather than use the pop-up.
Works more reliably than P-TTL.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Very confused.. at 24/02/2008 - 22:51
I think the point here is that your set-up is not wireless flash, which is the subject of this thread.
Wireless flash means that there is communication between the camera and the remote flash in order to ensure correct exposure.
As stated, wireless flash works on the better Pentax DSLRs using the camera's pop-up flash unit and a remote 360 or 540.
What you are talking about is simple slave flash, which is very different. As you say, you have to use trial and error to obtain exposure, which is not exactly 21st Century.
There is no need for you to use an expensive 360, because you could achieve the same effect by using a cheap manual flash attached to a light sensor - obtainable on Ebay for a couple of quid.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Very confused.. at 24/02/2008 - 15:52
The AF-360FGZ does work as a slave flash, triggered by the light from the on-camera flash. So you can hold it in your hand to get some side light.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Very confused.. at 23/02/2008 - 23:18
Right
So basically, I cant use it wireless on my K100D without two of them, and the way I would want to use it wireless (ie, hold it to the left of me, or something), it wouldnt be triggered anyway, so I would need the cable and hotshoe adapter.
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Very confused.. at 23/02/2008 - 14:30
Not all cameras can do this with their built-in flash (only the *ist D, K10D, and perhaps some others). You need to have wireless-compatible flashguns (360, 540, etc) as well.
So if your camera is compatible, you just need a wirelss flashgun. If it's not, you need two wireless flashguns, or cables (which is a whole subject in itself).
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on Very confused.. at 23/02/2008 - 11:59
This wireless trigger is control discreteness for camera to trigger the studio flash synchronously. It's made up of two parts named signal transmitter and receiver. Receiver power type: Battery. The signal transmitter makes use of advanced circuit design and comport. It can transmit wireless signal that is being encoded. It can totally control four different flashes as the picture above showing us.
Notice: Power supply of the signal transmitter: 23A 12V mini-battery (in the transmitter) Power supply of the receiver: two AAA batteries (not included) Max available in distance range: 50M (Open fields, no fraise) The output socket has two size are 6.35mm and 3.5mm
I am beginning to understand your confusion!
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on which remote trigger setup to buy at 23/02/2008 - 14:37
yes I might buy one of those light triggers for when light can cut it. But it is the radio triggers that offer the best solution.
Sometimes I just want to be able to leave a flash under a bush or round a corner and radio is the way to go.
the cheap slaves I have don't have any PC connections. we're talking 99p plus P&P!
for the radio triggers there's loads of confusing info about voltage, Version numbers and mixing them up and what versions work with what flash. I just need a kit sold in UK to cover my K10, new Metz and maybe 2 old slaves.
The only question you might want to ask is what range they have.
What was the problem with the ones you bought before?
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on which remote trigger setup to buy at 23/02/2008 - 14:34
Yes I need radio triggers. Studio distance will do but longer would certainly be fun.
I have a Metz 58 af-1 which is great, but light triggered flash has a number of limitations, notably - blind spots.
But I want to get creative and fire 2 or 3 flashes (cheap manual slaves) so I need radio triggers.
If not, and you want something that works at long distances, then you are probably talking big money. However, I have heard that people have been able to use cable at 100 ft or even more.
If cost is the issue, then a hotshoe-mounted pc adapter attached to a long wire attached to a flashgun with a pc socket might work. The wired camera can trigger the other flashes using cheap sensors like this:
http://tinyurl.com/24jm7h
G
Comment by George Lazarette posted on which remote trigger setup to buy at 23/02/2008 - 12:12


Look out for an old manual-focus lens from Pentax or Ricoh or Tamron (especially) and you should be OK.
G