George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
Good review. Thanks.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on K20D - first impressions at 25/02/2008 - 14:35

George Lazarette
All Pentax flashguns have low voltage, and are safe with any Pentax camera.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on K20D - first impressions at 25/02/2008 - 14:32

George Lazarette
THe 24-90 is indeed lovely, and works fine on digital. The only problem with it is the awkward range. It's a one-lens-wonder on film, but not wide enough to use on it's own with a DSLR.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Tokina 11-16mm F2.8 - will it become a DA*? at 27/02/2008 - 11:06

George Lazarette
Quote:
George Lazarette wrote:

Top of the tree in every way are the Limiteds
I would agree with you if talking about the FA Ltds but does the same hold true for the newer varieties? I don't own any of the DA Ltds to be able to judge...

Will
I am allowing them the benefit of my ignorance, though I must say that I have never heard people rave about them as they do about the FAs.

And they are slow - but that's a consequence of their pancake shape.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Tokina 11-16mm F2.8 - will it become a DA*? at 26/02/2008 - 20:10

George Lazarette
Quote:
Ok silly question time.
So what criteria does a lens have to follow too qualify as a Star* :
Why is the 12-24 not a star : also the 77mm and 31mm :
Is it just the build quality of the lens that qualifies it as a star*
I think it is reasonable to say that there is a pecking order that the designations don't fully reflect.

Top of the tree in every way are the Limiteds
Star lenses are next
High quality but undesignated primes are next - ie: 50mm, 100mm macro
High quality but undesignated zooms are next - ie: 12-24, 24-90, 70-210
Then good, general quality lenses - ie: 16-45
Kit lenses come last

That's my take, anyway.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Tokina 11-16mm F2.8 - will it become a DA*? at 26/02/2008 - 18:30

George Lazarette
I rather like some overlap. Saves changing lenses so often.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Tokina 11-16mm F2.8 - will it become a DA*? at 26/02/2008 - 09:34

George Lazarette
Also very nice. But I don't know that it is better. The foreground was good. So is the framing of the new one. :

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Llanddwyn Island sunset - Anglesey North Wales at 25/02/2008 - 00:04

George Lazarette
Super view, and great light. Well done.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Llanddwyn Island sunset - Anglesey North Wales at 24/02/2008 - 22:53

George Lazarette
Quote:
You're right: the lens is no lightweight - but nor am I or my K10D

Too many Danish pastries, I expect.

Actually, it's a very good deal. The filter would perhaps have cost a tenner, ditto the tripod, and you can probably sell the fifties for 40 smackers.

Net cost of excellent F lens: 40 squids.

Quote:
I actually expected the lens to feel heavier from what I had read, but then again: I haven't lugged it around for a whole day yet!
The lens isn't that heavy. It's just that slow, modern, plastic, zooms are very light.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Batch of lenses any good? at 25/02/2008 - 00:16

George Lazarette
Pentax produced four 70-210mm lenses.

The SMCP-A and -F versions are both highly rated (though of different design).

There were also Takumar versions (no multi-coating) which, IF they differ only in the lack of coating, may be OK, but I would eschew them, personally.

If the others are of the same vintage, don't expect miracles. However, if the Vivitar is the Series One macro, it might be rather good.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Batch of lenses any good? at 23/02/2008 - 18:47

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo