George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
Since most people only buy AP for the ads, why don't they omit the editorial altogether?

I think I'll put this suggestion to the publisher.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Amateur Photographer at 02/03/2011 - 17:41

George Lazarette
Tyr wrote:

I wanted a boat, my wife wanted a house. Got the house

Nah, just kidding, house is good too....
Whatever happened to compromise? You should have got a house-boat.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on I'm back (kind of) with a little guessing game at 02/03/2011 - 16:55

George Lazarette
I have to say that I agree with Spider. Very odd.

Perhaps the number of people hoping for (and actually expecting) a 135-format DSLR from Pentax is greater than hitherto suspected.

Or perhaps just a few optimists are trying to corner the market in 135-format lenses, just as Nelson Bunker Hunt did with the silver market in the late seventies. (He got wiped out.)

Or perhaps Pentax really ARE going to turn myth into reality, and surprise the sober citizens. And Pentax employees-in-the-know are doing the buying.

But there is a flaw in all these suppositions. Why aren't the prices of other 135-format lens also taking off?

G
(Baffled)

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Can anyone explain this? at 02/03/2011 - 16:50

George Lazarette
DrOrloff wrote:
Would anyone like to hazard a guess when I may actually finish the damn work in the house?

That's easy.

It will take exactly six times as long as you originally predicted. But it will never quite be finished. And it will cost two and a half times your original budget.

Then you will need to start maintaining it.
Be grateful that it is only a house.

Now a boat, that's another matter altogether.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on I'm back (kind of) with a little guessing game at 02/03/2011 - 16:40

George Lazarette
It's OK, I wasn't criticising your decision. I was simply echoing Matt's view, for the benefit of others who might be considering this lens, that it is excellent.

I have not heard anyone else complain of the focusing problem, so I assume I have just been unlucky.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Any FA 28-70 F4 owners? at 02/03/2011 - 16:36

George Lazarette
Seany boy, I abhor sloppy thinking.

Let me repeat. There are no principles involved here. If you wish not to pay current prices, that is your prerogative.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on The Future of K5 Prices at 02/03/2011 - 16:33

George Lazarette
I'm on a roll.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Criminal? at 02/03/2011 - 16:31

George Lazarette
Agree with Matt. If you don't find the 17-70 to be very good, you have a bad example.

The image quality is barely inferior to the DA* 16-50. It really is a very good lens, optically.

Mine has a slight focusing issue, unfortunately. It's intermittent, and I fear that if I take it to be repaired it will behave itself while in the workshop.

I blame Murphy.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Any FA 28-70 F4 owners? at 02/03/2011 - 16:29

George Lazarette
Clever the way the prog has removed the purple fringing from the image and placed it at the top.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Linux image apps roundup at 02/03/2011 - 16:05

George Lazarette
Let's disassemble Mr McLennan, drop Damien Hurst into a vat of formaldehyde, and pour a load of concrete down Tracey Emin's throat.

That would be an exhibition I'd pay to see.

(Just joking, Damo and Trace. Love you really.)

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Criminal? at 02/03/2011 - 16:00

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo