George Lazarette

Joined: 14th January 2004

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

George Lazarette
"Not tested, but will POSSIBLY be OK."

And probably not.

I think you are on swampy ground.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Ebay returns at 05/03/2011 - 10:39

George Lazarette
Buy second-hand.

My 31mm cost me £350, I think, from a forum member. But I concede you might have to pay a little more now.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on What lenses to keep and what to get rid of and what new lens should I buy? at 05/03/2011 - 10:24

George Lazarette
As Mat says, it's the elders, and what appear to be their smiles, that make this shot.

Is the viewer anthropomorphising, or is parental pride a universal emotion shared by all mammals?

I incline to the latter view.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on another baby shot at 05/03/2011 - 09:59

George Lazarette
Yes, thanks for that, K10D.

I shall look out for it - if the Bahrainis haven't used it all for Molotov Cocktails.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on K7 K5 Gross Over Exposure Problem at 05/03/2011 - 09:11

George Lazarette
johnriley wrote:
Matt, very interesting and quite possible.
Almost certainly the correct explanation, I should have thought.

Yet again somebody has blamed his kit for his own error. Reminds me of the time when somebody (who claimed to be a professional photographer) complained of exposure issues on his *ist D. He was very upset, too. Was going to switch brands. (I reported this here in 2005.)

He was photographing a boy jumping out of a tree in a forest clearing. The tree was lit by sunlight, the background was very dark, and the boy was wearing a white shirt and black trousers.

Guess what? He was using spot metering. So the camera was alternately trying to meter off bright tree, dark background, white shirt, and black trousers as the boy plummetted to the ground.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on K7 K5 Gross Over Exposure Problem at 05/03/2011 - 08:46

George Lazarette
greynolds999 wrote:
I was all for curry tonight but the other half is too tired.
To make it, or to eat it?

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Another pointless thread at 05/03/2011 - 08:25

George Lazarette
jpmb76 wrote:
All my AF lenses I bought brand new, and all manual ones, used.
Some of us, sadly, are old enough o have bought manual lenses when they were new, and when not only Ebay but the internet too were unimaginable.

But all the manual lenses I bought new have either been stolen, left in a taxi(!), or sold.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on D-BG2, D-BG4 ??? at 05/03/2011 - 08:08

George Lazarette
I suspect you may have a faulty example.

My 16-50 was fast and optically excellent. But there are other lenses that are nearly as good, and you have to really want weather sealing and f2.8 in order to justify the price premium.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on Getting upset with Pentax at 05/03/2011 - 07:57

George Lazarette
I don't know about you, JPMB, but I seldom buy brand-new lenses. Of my twenty-something collection, a mere handful cost more than £260.00. My various 50s, one of the Ltds, my 400mm, my 100mm FA macro, and various others were all "new to me" when I bought them, and all cost under £200.00.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on D-BG2, D-BG4 ??? at 04/03/2011 - 23:36

George Lazarette
Incidentally, I have shot RAW almost exclusively since 2004.

G

Comment by George Lazarette posted on D-BG2, D-BG4 ??? at 04/03/2011 - 21:50

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo