All Forum Comments
Comment by fatspider posted on I need ND Filter Help Please at 02/04/2007 - 21:44
whichever you go for you'll need a filter holder and adaptor rings to suit the lens your using. have a quick look here for some ideas;
http://www.cokin.co.uk/pages/main.htm
you'll probably need P series.
Alternatively shoot RAW and aim for an in-between exposure, then adjust forground and sky and save as seperate files for merging in photoshop
Comment by fatspider posted on I need ND Filter Help Please at 02/04/2007 - 21:43
Do not buy the Sigma EX APO 2x for use with Pentax lenses as most of these don't fit, the rear lens element collides with the front element of the converter, don't know if the 1.4x does the same but I hazard to say it does. Tamron make a nice AF 1.4x with the electrical contacts as do Kenko and I'm pretty sure they fit most Pentax lenses.
As George mentions I have found the Pentax 1.7x to be very good but they are commanding a rather high price (£150+) on ebay at the moment.
Best bet would be to check the rearmost position of the rear element before fitting any lens to any brand TC
I remember buying a X3 converter for my Om30 for the Solar Eclipse, my 35mm lens had a protruding "flange" on the mount to prevent it been fitted to a converter due to its pronounced rear element.
Why cant Pentax do that?
Comment by fatspider posted on Another Tele-converter question... at 03/04/2007 - 18:22
The prints stand up well to scrutiny in Camera Club competitions, alongside those of fellow members who I know use genuine branded inks.
OK, to be fair they may not have the longevity but I can always run another print off
I generally print on Epson Premium Photo Glossy but have used them with cheap papers as well (also from Computer Market)
If I need a print to last I can always get it done at a lab, but I fail to see the point in spending hundreds of pounds on a printer and genuine inks for the (assumed) slightly better quality I would get.
PS; I have had a panoramic up on the wall, in a very brightly lit location and it is only just begining to show signs of fading after 18months, that was using the Signal ink and brand X paper.
Comment by fatspider posted on Home Printing, Pro's and Cons ? at 01/04/2007 - 21:51
Comment by fatspider posted on My first wedding pics with k10 at 01/04/2007 - 21:58
Second one I like, where is it :
Comment by fatspider posted on my try at mono at 01/04/2007 - 22:06
If your happy with the Ds you'd be ecstatic with a K10D, I use my Pentax 80-320 on the K10D and get sharp images as low as 1/125th sec handheld, someone with steadier hands could probably do better.
As for cropping, I have cropped images up to 1/3rd original and they still yield good A4 prints
Comment by fatspider posted on K10 + Tamron 300 f2.8 at 01/04/2007 - 00:04
Comment by fatspider posted on K10D anti-shake with monopod or beanbag at 31/03/2007 - 23:51
Forum veteran
Fashion Photographer
And stirrer of Hornets Nests
Keep up the good work mate
PS; sorry for coming in so late on the thread, just got back from sunny Fuerteventura
Comment by fatspider posted on Looks Like I Indirectly Started a Dispute at DP Reviews at 30/03/2007 - 16:09
One other tip, placing a heavy beanbag on top of the lens will help reduce vibration of the mirror.
QUick Edit.....just had a thought, some heavier duty tripods have a larger thread for mounting the head, some are reversable offering both options while some I believe need an adaptor.
Comment by fatspider posted on Tripod question. at 06/04/2007 - 19:54

