fatspider

Joined: 11th June 2006

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

fatspider
Quote:
What are you trying to achieve by taking a photo?
There are many different forms of photography just as there are various types of engineering.
Some engineers build bridges and hope they will stay up, and some of us take photographs in the hope that someone will want to "put them up"

From a personal point when I take a photograph I try to achieve something that is produced by the camera and not by computer software, though many will argue that software is just what produces the image in the camera in the first place

Photography is many things to as many people and I'm sure that many of us try to include and artistic element into our snaps, just like Engineers do when building bridges.

Comment by fatspider posted on Why take a photogaph? at 19/01/2009 - 09:53

fatspider
The way I understand it is that while the camera is set to matrix metering, if link AF & AE is enabled the camera will in effect work in a similar way to centre weighted, ie; normally the centre portion of the image will expose brighter, but with AF & AE linked this will be linked to the focus point.

A bit like having C/W metering but concentrated on any of the focus points in the frame, think of it as "selective" C/W metering so if the focus point is say to the left of the frame then that is where the camera will meter.

I believe the camera must be set to Matrix for this to work.

Comment by fatspider posted on Link AF Point and AE - DOH!! at 16/01/2009 - 21:40

fatspider
I can see John's point but still think the shop has to stand the loss, what if Oggy had not wanted to pay any more than he did? regardless of the error Oggy is still entitled to a reciept that states what he bought for the price he paid.

Consider this:
Oggy does nothing and the camera fails in six months time, he returns it to the shop as per his consumer rights and they send it off for repair, when it comes back they have replaced it with a K200D Oggy hasn't got a leg to stand on cos' his reciept says thats what he bought!

Comment by fatspider posted on Does anyone know where I stand? at 16/01/2009 - 18:44

fatspider
I didn't notice anything wrong with mine, but maybe I'm easilly pleased

Some shots from my first outing with the 16-50, posted as a few examples of course, not for their photographic merit

https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/Dublins-Fair-City-9152

Comment by fatspider posted on 16-50* f2.8 owners at 16/01/2009 - 00:05

fatspider
Hardgravity wrote:
Personally I think the competitions should be Pentax only, 3rd party lenses OK, but Pentax bodies.

I'm coming round to the view that the gallery should be for Pentax only and any other pics posted in a different section, otherwise we could have the gallery hi-jacked with inferior images from...
So what about posting pics taken with Pentax lenses on Canon bodies

PLEASE....no hate mail

Comment by fatspider posted on Non Pentax Cameras at 15/01/2009 - 23:58

fatspider
DEMAND your rightful proof of purchase or tell them you want a full refund, even if the equipment HAS been used. (make sure its full of greasy fingermarks when you take it back)

As an afterthought re-warranty, surely they have entered the cameras serial number onto the reciept, if so then no problem.

Comment by fatspider posted on Does anyone know where I stand? at 15/01/2009 - 23:52

fatspider
impotentspider wrote:
I got my cashback yesterday (credited to my bank account) However I didnt get it all!

Either the cashback for my 50-135 will be credited seperately or Pentax have shortchanged me
Just a quick update:
I finally got around to writing to Pentax, posted the letter monday and got a phone call from Pentax this morning apologising for the error and saying my account would be credited with the shortfall in around three days I'm well pleased with the service.

Comment by fatspider posted on Pentax Cashback at 15/01/2009 - 23:37

fatspider
Speaking as someone who bought one for my K10D I personally found it didn't offer "me" much more than the manual. It does explain things better than some of the rather bad translations in the manual and it would be of extreme help to someone who is fairly new to photography.

For someone new to photography who finds it difficult to get their head around focal lengths, effects of aperture, DOF etc then it is a good buy.

Comment by fatspider posted on Magic Lantern guides at 14/01/2009 - 22:55

fatspider
You should have no problems shooting the moon without a tripod, just wait for a clear night and you should be able to get shutter speeds of 1/750+

Comment by fatspider posted on Early attempt with Sigme 150-500 on my K20D at 14/01/2009 - 22:39

fatspider
Quote:
Both of these were handheld, so it is my fault
Probably not entirely! more likely the SR system has contributed by shifting the sensor, I get it an awful lot and its always dropping to the right slightly.

Comment by fatspider posted on Thought I'd have a go at sunsets at 14/01/2009 - 19:43

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo