All Forum Comments
but its impact on perspective will still be a 55mm lens, not an 85mm lens, won't it?
BUT...would a 55mm lens designed to form a smaller image circle have the same properties regarding focal length and DOF?
Comment by fatspider posted on Pentax postponed the launch of DA Star 55mm F1.4 SDM to February at 25/01/2009 - 00:50
If a tree falls in the forest with no one there to here it does it still make a noise?
Comment by fatspider posted on OFF Topic.......Topic at 25/01/2009 - 00:33
Comment by fatspider posted on Flight Of Fancy Pt2 at 25/01/2009 - 00:30
Ah! but the question was can you turn it off.
The shutter noise could theoretically be turned off but this would require several screwdrivers and somthing to short out the noise generator circiuts, and of course you'd have to take care to avoid the plasma conduits and make sure the Dilithium matrix remained undisturbed or you could cause flappy feedback to the dormant GPS distributor hub, and if you disturb that your thingymawotsits will go limp and you'll be in real trouble
Comment by fatspider posted on OFF Topic.......Topic at 25/01/2009 - 00:23
but will the new 55mm have magic fairy dust
I'm not concerned about the delay, or even the delay of the 60-250, I cant possibly afford either (which really means the wife will kill me if I say the LBA words)
Comment by fatspider posted on Pentax postponed the launch of DA Star 55mm F1.4 SDM to February at 25/01/2009 - 00:09
Just had my tiger photo featured on redbubble.com here http://www.redbubble.com/people/jackitec/art/2288600-2-who-are-you-looking-at
Comment by fatspider posted on OFF Topic.......Topic at 24/01/2009 - 23:59
and it's not a shutter it's a mirror flappy thingy
There is an electronic noise generated to simulate what would have been a shutter firing if the camera had one, if you dont believe me put it on self timer with 2sec delay , you hear the mirror lock up then you hear a "simulated" shutter firing noise
Comment by fatspider posted on OFF Topic.......Topic at 24/01/2009 - 23:53
This looks a bit over the top to me, what do you guys think?
Shot on the Bigma at around 300mm 1/125 f6.7 ISO 800 (miserable day) SORRY! just a quick EDIT, ISO 400
[IMG]http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j168/impotentspider/_K206466a.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by fatspider posted on Chafinch at 24/01/2009 - 23:41
In the end I decided to give it to my son for Xmas, with my first grandchild on the way I thought it would be an excelent way of ensuring decent pictures of her growing up Whether that happens remains to be seen, we rushed over to the hospital last week to find him snapping away without the flash, 1/6th wide open (set on auto)
Comment by fatspider posted on An appeal. at 24/01/2009 - 23:16


I was rather hoping you guys would agree with me I'm still not convinced that the colours dont look over-cooked, especially the greens which almost look radioactive
After posting this last night I decided to try adjusting the colour, I had to reduced the saturation by 20% to get something I thought was acceptable.
[IMG]http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j168/impotentspider/_K206466b.jpg[/IMG]
Maybe I like Pentax because the basic setting on the camera gives me what I want