From a walk a couple of weeks ago.







Comments?

If you feel its too much risk then you should not buy. Lets leave the opportunity to get some goodies on the forum.

Instead of adding more threads I'll put some more stuff on this thread.
I've got allot of organizing till I leave Edinburgh.

My kit lens has been resting since getting the 17-70mm.

SMC-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 MkII











The lens is in great shape, with only some scuffs in the hood. Comes with original caps and in original box. Bought from SRS in July of 08, together with my K10D. Price is £45 shipped to UK.

I like me quotes as well Ted, but I think
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" is generally attributed to Benjamin Franklin.
And George Bernard Shaw said:
"Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve"

And George Carlin said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk

You mean to point at the cameras?
Hmm...

I once thought of doing a project on cameras in public spaces. Of course the first thing I imagined would happen was me in police cell. Freedom does not work both ways does it?

Oh no no no, because...
despite the fact that incorrect alerts grant zero points and alerts "in good faith" even if no crime is committed grant 1 point,
and despite the fact that if you want to alert more than 3 times a month you can just purchase 3 more alert allowance for £1...

Despite this:
"Internet Eyes does not consider its service is creating a “snoopers paradise”, “snitching” “a game” or “gambling” and will ensure effective measures are in place to prevent this."

I knew somehow this would happen... Who is responsible now? The principle of the thing was bad to start with and now comes this massive erosion on any safeguarding or control of information. Stop it now.

I bet you'll have plenty of those nutcases, people who shout pedophile or terrorist whenever they see a photographer on the street, joining in this nonsense.

What the heck is going on?
Why is this happening?

I don't even know where to begin...

The MX with a SMC-A 50mm F1.4. But I think only once.

I was surprise to see K20D outperforming the rest in most ISOs, for detail at least.
Pentax does not do NR well it has to be said...
A bit disapointed with the K-7 in that respect, was expecting at least the same as K20D.

It just hit me though, that although so many scorn Pentax for not being a pro camera brand, the fact that its RAW is so good or even JPEG holds more detail than the others, is such an overlooked fact.
Good ISO is only in the pro brands