ARE YOU MENTAL?

edumad
Posted 12/10/2009 - 20:08 Link
What the heck is going on?
Why is this happening?

I don't even know where to begin...
mikew
Posted 12/10/2009 - 20:15 Link
Mental sums it up neatly. I heard about it on the radio over the weekend. It's hard to credit but I bet loads of people take it up.

Mike
---------------------------------------------------

You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
misiek_knm
Posted 12/10/2009 - 20:31 Link
Why are you surprised? There are people watching 'Big Brother' (and similar) programs on TV for free (or they even pay for that!). It's the next step.
Kind regards,
Michal R. Hoffmann
K20D, DA 16-45mm, A 50mm F/1:1.4, DA 55-300mm; flash Pentax AF240Z
Hardgravity
Posted 12/10/2009 - 20:46 Link
Yes but watching CCTV cameras that show nothing...

...I'd rather watch paint dry!

What sort of moron does this?
Cheers, HG

K110+DA40, K200+DA35, K3 and a bag of lenses, bodies and other bits.

Mustn't forget the Zenits, or folders, or...

PPG entries.
Father Ted
Posted 12/10/2009 - 21:28 Link
A nosey one!

A license for voyeurs!!
Getting there! Thanks to you guys

Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
edumad
Posted 12/10/2009 - 22:04 Link
I knew somehow this would happen... Who is responsible now? The principle of the thing was bad to start with and now comes this massive erosion on any safeguarding or control of information. Stop it now.

I bet you'll have plenty of those nutcases, people who shout pedophile or terrorist whenever they see a photographer on the street, joining in this nonsense.
edumad
Posted 12/10/2009 - 22:20 Link
Father Ted wrote:
A nosey one!
A license for voyeurs!!
Oh no no no, because...
despite the fact that incorrect alerts grant zero points and alerts "in good faith" even if no crime is committed grant 1 point,
and despite the fact that if you want to alert more than 3 times a month you can just purchase 3 more alert allowance for £1...

Despite this:
"Internet Eyes does not consider its service is creating a “snoopers paradise”, “snitching” “a game” or “gambling” and will ensure effective measures are in place to prevent this."
Anvh
Posted 12/10/2009 - 22:28 Link
Yeah no game at all...

The camera owner will then feedback (rate) the result of the alert. Their feedback is converted into points and entered into a Viewers monthly league table. At the end of each month the highest scoring Viewer will receive the reward money; this could be split in the event of a tie.
misiek_knm
Posted 13/10/2009 - 00:10 Link
Now, let's wait for Running Man online. And these people laughed at SF books not so long time ago...
Kind regards,
Michal R. Hoffmann
K20D, DA 16-45mm, A 50mm F/1:1.4, DA 55-300mm; flash Pentax AF240Z
sandy
Posted 13/10/2009 - 07:14 Link
It sounds real daft and people will have a go in the hope of winning the reward money.

Sandy
K10D
Posted 13/10/2009 - 09:30 Link
Its a flash in the pan,

Wonder if the sale of laser pointers baloon?

Regards
Too far from a shore.
edumad
Posted 13/10/2009 - 10:42 Link
You mean to point at the cameras?
Hmm...

I once thought of doing a project on cameras in public spaces. Of course the first thing I imagined would happen was me in police cell. Freedom does not work both ways does it?
misiek_knm
Posted 13/10/2009 - 22:04 Link
Freedom, you say - let me quote Megadeth, 'Hook in Mouth':

(...)
F is for fighting, R is for red,
Ancestors' blood in battles they've shed.
E, we elect them, E, we eject them,
In the land of the free and the home of the brave.
D, for your dying, O, your overture,
M is for money and you know what that cures.
This spells out freedom, it means nothing to me (...)


We're selling our freedom bit by bit in the name of so called 'security'. But this goes more and more out of topic, I'm afraid
Kind regards,
Michal R. Hoffmann
K20D, DA 16-45mm, A 50mm F/1:1.4, DA 55-300mm; flash Pentax AF240Z
Father Ted
Posted 13/10/2009 - 22:09 Link
misiek_knm wrote:


We're selling our freedom bit by bit in the name of so called 'security'. But this goes more and more out of topic, I'm afraid
I think it was Franklin Roselvelt who said (and I paraphrase), "Those who sell their freedom for security deserve neither".


Oh, and my email signature..."Quis custodiat ipsos custodes"
Getting there! Thanks to you guys

Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
mikew
Posted 14/10/2009 - 07:26 Link
edumad wrote:
You mean to point at the cameras?
Hmm...

I once thought of doing a project on cameras in public spaces. Of course the first thing I imagined would happen was me in police cell. Freedom does not work both ways does it?
I regularly photograph cameras and make a point of being highly visible while doing so. I think being furtive might have consequences.

Sadly they tend to be rubbish photographs
---------------------------------------------------

You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo