DrOrloff

Joined: 21st October 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

DrOrloff
Very well done.

Comment by DrOrloff posted on Well I'm stunned too! at 26/08/2011 - 10:00

DrOrloff
Quite an achievement, very well done.

Comment by DrOrloff posted on International acceptances at 26/08/2011 - 09:59

DrOrloff
Yes, wonderful.

Comment by DrOrloff posted on Red Arrows do Bournemouth at 24/08/2011 - 18:28

DrOrloff
Exceptional.

Comment by DrOrloff posted on In Memory at 24/08/2011 - 18:16

DrOrloff
Superb set, 5 is my pick although my favourite is a flickr one not posted - a 'split' over boats.

Comment by DrOrloff posted on Red Arrows do Bournemouth at 24/08/2011 - 18:14

DrOrloff
I find my DA12-24 indispensable for landscapes. I supplement it with a K35mm and M50mm which slip easily in the bag and I find it a very versatile combination.

Stitching is a good option for motionless subjects, but wouldn't work where there is a fair degree of motion in the landscape, water, clouds, vegetation, people, etc. I also particularly like long exposures.

I also find 12-24 covers a very wide range and I wouldn't want to be constantly swapping a 14 and 21 at the seafront for instance.

Comment by DrOrloff posted on Lens - decisions decisions (wrong ones) at 24/08/2011 - 13:52

DrOrloff

Comment by DrOrloff posted on Oh the DA* 50-135 how you have been missed! at 23/08/2011 - 22:56

DrOrloff
Interesting. I can't make head nor tail of those reviews which are all numbers, statistics and graphs. Me I'm a simpleton and I just look at the piccies.

I was really thinking of what is the best value for money lens at market value, rather than a particular bargain found. So I would compare my K35 at £75 (the recent price here) versus a M501.7 at £30. I have some 50f1.7's and an f2,but have I've not used a f1.4 or 1.2. My 35 blows the 50 1.7 away and so I think is better value.

The comparison with the DAL35mm f2.4 is interesting, since the second hand prices are probably comparable. I haven't seen that many pictures with that lens, but of those I have seen I would say that it excels for portraiture.

What got me thinking about this lens was Frogfish's poll on favourite/most used lenses. The K35 didn't even feature in any of the categories, which I found surprising since I consider it both stunningly good and pretty cheap, a well kept secret perhaps. If I were forced to keep only one lens from my collection it would probably be the K35.

Comment by DrOrloff posted on The Best Value Pentax Lens? at 23/08/2011 - 12:26

DrOrloff
I have the 1.7 and 55-300, as yet untested. I will fire off some shots and deliver my verdict.

Comment by DrOrloff posted on using a SMC PENTAX F AF 1.7X ADAPTER with at 22/08/2011 - 13:25

DrOrloff
Here are some images I took yesterday with the K Series 35mm f3.5. I think they nicely demonstrate the capabilities of this lens (although they were handheld and I could get them a bit sharper). I might make them into a triptych when I work out how.

Primary Colours:
Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image



The lens cost me £30 odd. One recently went on here for £75, which is probably a fair market value.

I find this lens absolutely excels in many ways, sharpness, colour reproduction, lack of CA.

My question: Is the K35mmf3.5 the best value Pentax lens in the catalogue?

Comment by DrOrloff posted on The Best Value Pentax Lens? at 22/08/2011 - 13:19

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo