All Forum Comments
Comment by Don posted on what happens when yuo apply every photoshop filter to an image? at 13/09/2008 - 18:26
Comment by Don posted on "Bridging Camera" at 13/09/2008 - 17:30
Intereactive cd/dvd's with a searchable interface.
They could have a cute cartoon charactor, that you could type in your questions and get answers and tutorials on how-to.
I'm all for naming the concept "Ask Mattmatic"
Comment by Don posted on More Flash Fun on Pentax at 13/09/2008 - 17:15
Other wise it just uses the recipe to display the image on screen....your original is untouched.
Comment by Don posted on RAW from JPEG at 13/09/2008 - 16:54
But under the hood, so to speak, the files are different. Raw is more flexible, you're working with more data in the file.
now jpegs, if you are a good and careful shooter, meter properly, expose correctly, color balance right on, and you happen to like the (soft comparered to canikon) way your camera processes the file, are just fine.
I used to shoot jpegs, I'm not a sloppy shooter, and jpegs would do me just fine. But....I have several, powerful computers, tonnes of storage, and lot's of cameras. I shoot weddings and to be honest, shooting raw has made the shoots go faster, and on a few occasions saved some shots (usually the weddings that plan to be outdoors, during the worst times of the day, no shade...).
At $2400.00+ a pop, I'd say Raw is worth it for me.
but I know, if I need to, I can switch to jpeg in the feild, and fit a few more images on the card before swapping...
Comment by Don posted on RAW from JPEG at 13/09/2008 - 16:14
I like it!
but maybe hybrid af system, using Phase detection, AND active ir rangefinding in comination with face detection. for taking images of people who aren't lawyers or politicians?
Comment by Don posted on Is Pentax is Serious about Digital SLRs? at 12/09/2008 - 19:54
Comment by Don posted on "Bridging Camera" at 12/09/2008 - 19:24
Comment by Don posted on picture of my son at 12/09/2008 - 14:50
Of course several minutes into my first of ten days (after school) detention, I realized, using my own name was a mistake....
Comment by Don posted on DON'T BUY PENTAX DIGITAL LENSES!!! at 12/09/2008 - 00:25
DON'T BUY PENTAX DIGITAL LENSES.
The reason is that these lenses can't be used on analog bodies and on future full-frame sensor digital bodies. The great advantage of Pentax was the compatibility among their products. Where is it now?
And not only this. Every TTL flash by Pentax doesn't cooperate with digital bodies from DL and then.
Pentax K100, K110, DL, K10 can not use TTL technology, but P-TTL instead.
Ok, Pentax your customers bought FTZ-500 for 400€. Some other have Pentax 330, some other Metz, etc.
My friends "DON' T BUY ANY PENTAX LENSES, UNLESS THEY ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE OLDER BODIES"
I am terribly sorry about it, but we must answer to the technical faults of Pentax.
What brand should I buy? name one company out there that hasn't had a model or product line that got changed or discontinued? More specifically, name one company, in the SLR Camera business that has a better record than Pentax for backward compatibility? If Pentax breaks it's line up into ff and aps sensors, why shouldn't I buy digital lenses for my ds2 or k10's? And if a ff dslr comes out in the near future, do I have to buy it? no. will there be an aps model available? yes. If I can afford the ff body, will my older ff pre dslr lenses work? bet on it! will they tide me over til I buy newer ff lenses? I'd bet on it.
You why are you so dogmatic about bashing Pentax? go buy a canon, or a nikon...(might want to check thier records on back/forward compatibility first though...)
now, back to a more interesting subject:
10 print "Don is Great";
20 gosub 40
30 goto 10
40 int a =rnd 3
50 if a=1 then print "! ";
60 if a=2 then print "!! ";
70 if a=3 then print "!!! ";
80 endsub
back in the day, that was a sophisticated program, written by a genius!
Comment by Don posted on DON'T BUY PENTAX DIGITAL LENSES!!! at 11/09/2008 - 23:37


