davex

Joined: 13th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

davex
Definitely the Macro and 55-300.
Not sure why you would take the 16-45, but the 50mm 1.4 would come in useful for evening indoor shots.
You could probably do with something else a bit longer, but not a monster;
Sigma af 400 f5.6, would be useful for birding (if they have them in Kenya).
They can be had for around £200, put a WTB in the classified, you never know who will respond.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Safari lens suggestions at 27/05/2011 - 18:00

davex
IMHO No 1 would have worked slightly better if the subjects bodies had been slightly turned toward each other, or had both been looking inwards, as it is their posture and eyes direct the viewer outwards.
No2 looks good, but maybe the subjects should have been closer to the oval thing, as they are they are a little bit lost in the frame.
Other than those points I like them.
Good use of the fisheye, and the flash in No1.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on fish eye... at 26/05/2011 - 17:25

davex
Hate to differ but the 12-24 is simply stunning, it is the one lens I have never considered selling.
Yes 16mm or 17mm is a good fl for landscapes etc, but the other lenses cannot match the flexibility of the extra 12-16mm zoom range provided by the 12-24.
Also, it`s very close foccusing ability is IMHO unmatched by any of the others.
Try the 12-24 first, if you cannot get on with it (and some cannot)you should have no problem selling it on.
I believe there is one currently in the classified section.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Which lens for a new K5 at 26/05/2011 - 14:18

davex
Quote:
I wouldn't say £400 for the GF1 and 20mm lens was particularly cheap though
Ah, but you forget Mike, He has the cash from his Pentax sale, or is it from the Sony sale :

Comment by davex posted on FS: Pentax DA21mm f3.2 - Used at 25/05/2011 - 18:25

davex
Quote:
Pentax 50-135mm f2.8 DA* ED SDM
A fantastic lens, one of the forum favourites.
I owned one for 3 months, used it twice, then sold it. Build quality A++, IQ A++, internal zoom and focussing A++, but SDM ? B-, slow and there will always be a doubt about it sticking.
Go for the Sigma 70-200, I think there is a good one on the classified atm.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on K5 or Kr at 24/05/2011 - 22:07

davex
Quote:
Suspect that was cropped, which has made the bokeh more prominent.
Quite correct Pentaxophile, Original shot was taken from a sitting position in a moving safari vehicle, the exif data is still there; ISO400 @ f8.
I think it shows the quality of the lens quite well, perhaps I should have made the conditions clear in the OP.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on 55-300 or 50-200mm? at 24/05/2011 - 21:47

davex
Just to add to Mike-Ps;

Comment Image

Comment by davex posted on 55-300 or 50-200mm? at 24/05/2011 - 18:10

davex
Uncropped for me as well, I like the feeling that i am about to be run over

Comment by davex posted on Mountain Bike World Championships 2 I forgot! at 24/05/2011 - 11:56

davex
For me having the matching hood does make the difference, you can get a generic, but it isn`t the same.
Also, you may find the quickshift function on the DA a major benefit in some circumstances.
So for these two things alone I would spend the extra.
I also suspect but have no evidence that resale values for the DA may be comparatively higher.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on 55-300 or 50-200mm? at 24/05/2011 - 11:53

davex
wot MarkD said

Comment by davex posted on 55-300 or 50-200mm? at 24/05/2011 - 08:12

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo