DaveKitson

Joined: 22nd November 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

DaveKitson
I still have my *istD (more exactly, my youngest grandson does).

Initially I kept it to use where I was nervous about taking my main camera (climbing etc.), but now my grandson uses it when we are out.

He is enthusiastic about it, and it's good to see it still being used.

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on IstD one of the forerunners of DSLR`s at 27/05/2016 - 11:53

DaveKitson
Seems to be preparing for the tethering software..

There is also the usual 'improvements for general stabilty' line in the release doc.

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on K-1 Firmware Update 19-05-2016 = Latest Update at 19/05/2016 - 09:01

DaveKitson
I'll add my best wishes to the list....

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on Every Cloud... at 18/05/2016 - 17:33

DaveKitson
I am a little confused (happens more and more these days)

Are we discussing the new lens (D FA 3.5-f5.6) or the old FA 28-105 (f3.2-4.5)??

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on FA 28-105mm F3.2-4.5 at 17/05/2016 - 01:07

DaveKitson
I have been playing with this, and have concluded that motion correction is a software/firmware implementation that basically just scans the 4 images that comprise a PS image, and does not merge areas that show evidence of movement.

The K3II lacks the firmware to do this, so no motion-corrected JPGs straight from the camera but PDU5 will motion-correct K3II RAW files.

The Adobe pixelshift conversions don't (yet) correct for motion effects. The latest DCU5 does a far better conversion..

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on Pixel shift motion correction - K-3II and DCU5 at 17/05/2016 - 00:38

DaveKitson
Based on comparing ACR and PDCU conversions of the same PS image (using the Mk 1 eyeball), I believe that ACR does combine the 4 images into 1 but does not implement any motion correction.

ACR offers no options with respect to PS, you can't choose to correct for motion or not to combine the images if there are motion related artifacts. I will use PDCU for converting PS images.

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on Question about PixelShift at 13/05/2016 - 11:08

DaveKitson
It seems that Sigma are not hanging around on this:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/3395336918/sigma-offers-part-replacement-to-prevent...

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on Info regarding Sigma lenses on a K1 at 13/05/2016 - 10:55

DaveKitson
Just spotted this on a different forum. Sorry if it's already known.

http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/new/new_topic.php?id=582

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on Info regarding Sigma lenses on a K1 at 11/05/2016 - 14:21

DaveKitson
richandfleur wrote:
In reality that blurring/ghost image may not have been an issue, but it does highlight that the feature may well have limited real world application. I see it as a static landscape or static product photography tool at this stage. Akin to the issues you have with movement between bracketed shots for HDR use.
I agree...

Comment by DaveKitson posted on Question about PixelShift at 10/05/2016 - 23:58

DaveKitson
I downloaded a K3II DNG from Imaging-resource and processed it in PDCU 5.5.1.

PDCU allowed me to use MC on this K3II image, suggesting that MC is a Software/Firmware feature.

Crops from an area where motion was apparent:

Pixelshift ON Motion Correction OFF
Comment Image


Pixelshift ON Motion Correction ON
Comment Image


I'll play with K1 images in ACR tomorrow.

davek

Comment by DaveKitson posted on Question about PixelShift at 10/05/2016 - 23:35

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo