DaveHolmes

Joined: 28th April 2011

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

DaveHolmes
fatspider wrote:
I'd go with extension tubes too, and they are available with contacts.
I can't seem to find any with contacts... Saw a review of some 'Jessops' ones but I can't find any going...

Kenko do them (via SRS) in every mount except Pentax...

I think tubes will be a useful addition but for bugs I worry that having to go closer to the subject might be a disadvantage... Is this the case or is my thinking all wrong?

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Elements in teleconverters... at 07/02/2013 - 22:32

DaveHolmes
rosstownsley wrote:
So I managed to get a hold of a ME Super with M50 1.7; seems ot work fine but it is filthy and gritty; may need stripped down and cleaned....dare I?!
Cleaning is a painful and slow process but should be fine... If you're stripping the leatherette off yourself - Do it slowly and try not to stretch it... You can use it as a template for cutting a new leather...
Check there's no 'goo' around the mirror and you'll probably want to replace the seals

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Plunge to film... at 06/02/2013 - 21:38

DaveHolmes
annieogg wrote:
My main problem was the room it took up in my bag.
This is the main reason I don't use mine as much as I'd intended to...

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Grips. Essential or not? at 06/02/2013 - 18:40

DaveHolmes
I've got an Ex-Pro grip for the K5... Good for walking around but it comes off if I'm using (or even taking) my tripod... It does make packing my bag(s) more problematic when the grip is attached...

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Grips. Essential or not? at 06/02/2013 - 18:32

DaveHolmes
DaveHolmes wrote:
Some teleconverters have 5 elements and some have 7... What differences are the 2 extra (or less) elements going to bring (or lose) in real terms?

Does an MC5 give more or less in terms of IQ than an MC7???

And this?





gartmore wrote:
Perhaps the OP wants a 100mm as opposed to 50mm in order to be further away?
I have a 100mm macro (Samsung version of DFA100 2. lens but shooting bugs I have to crop quite considerably...
I tried a 2xTC in my local shop and it effectively doubled the size of the subject (in this case a counter screw) while also increasing (although only slightly) minimum focusing distance...


The TC I tried was a Kenko Teleplus 2x it has AF (f4 or brighter) but was a tad expensive at £180... It's a 7 element one...

Looking at the auction site it appears 7 element TCs are more expensive... Is the IQ considerably better than 5 element versions?

If so... Why is that?

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Elements in teleconverters... at 06/02/2013 - 09:29

DaveHolmes
I'm after a 2x teleconverter to go with my 100mm macro lens... The plan is to make little things 'bigger' (than 1:1)

Not too fussed about AF for this purpose (but it might be a plus in some situations) but it must have contacts for retaining aperture control in-body ('cos I want that!!)... So my options are already fairly limited


The thing is... Some teleconverters have 5 elements and some have 7... What differences are the 2 extra (or less) elements going to bring (or lose) in real terms?

Does an MC5 give more or less in terms of IQ than an MC7???

I don't get it... Help me understand...

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Elements in teleconverters... at 05/02/2013 - 17:07

DaveHolmes
I'll have them!!
I'll happily pay postage!!

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on disposal of cameras at 05/02/2013 - 13:10

DaveHolmes
Cheers guys... Next comp is 'print open' same catagorie choices... Norrowing it down today and getting prints done tomorrow...

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Entered comp at local club... at 05/02/2013 - 12:33

DaveHolmes
I would describe the noise as more 'rattley' than 'clunking' when in LV on my K5 but yes, seems to be normal... Someone here probably knows why...

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Noisy lens at 05/02/2013 - 12:28

DaveHolmes
Blythman wrote:
Mal wrote:
A pro photographer is someone who makes a living solely from photography so that rules me out
I disagree. A pro photography is someone who gets paid for his/her services as a photographer.

So, to clarify. Who gets paid for their services as a photographer?
I have on occasion been paid as a photographer or for photography related services... I am in no way a professional photographer despite being paid... I disagree with your disagreement...

Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Who is a pro photographer? at 03/02/2013 - 17:12

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo