All Forum Comments
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Elements in teleconverters... at 07/02/2013 - 22:32
So I managed to get a hold of a ME Super with M50 1.7; seems ot work fine but it is filthy and gritty; may need stripped down and cleaned....dare I?!
Check there's no 'goo' around the mirror and you'll probably want to replace the seals
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Plunge to film... at 06/02/2013 - 21:38
My main problem was the room it took up in my bag.
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Grips. Essential or not? at 06/02/2013 - 18:40
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Grips. Essential or not? at 06/02/2013 - 18:32
Some teleconverters have 5 elements and some have 7... What differences are the 2 extra (or less) elements going to bring (or lose) in real terms?
Does an MC5 give more or less in terms of IQ than an MC7???
Perhaps the OP wants a 100mm as opposed to 50mm in order to be further away?
I tried a 2xTC in my local shop and it effectively doubled the size of the subject (in this case a counter screw) while also increasing (although only slightly) minimum focusing distance...
The TC I tried was a Kenko Teleplus 2x it has AF (f4 or brighter) but was a tad expensive at £180... It's a 7 element one...
Looking at the auction site it appears 7 element TCs are more expensive... Is the IQ considerably better than 5 element versions?
If so... Why is that?
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Elements in teleconverters... at 06/02/2013 - 09:29
Not too fussed about AF for this purpose (but it might be a plus in some situations) but it must have contacts for retaining aperture control in-body ('cos I want that!!)... So my options are already fairly limited
The thing is... Some teleconverters have 5 elements and some have 7... What differences are the 2 extra (or less) elements going to bring (or lose) in real terms?
Does an MC5 give more or less in terms of IQ than an MC7???
I don't get it... Help me understand...
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Elements in teleconverters... at 05/02/2013 - 17:07
I'll happily pay postage!!
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on disposal of cameras at 05/02/2013 - 13:10
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Entered comp at local club... at 05/02/2013 - 12:33
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Noisy lens at 05/02/2013 - 12:28
A pro photographer is someone who makes a living solely from photography so that rules me out
So, to clarify. Who gets paid for their services as a photographer?
Comment by DaveHolmes posted on Who is a pro photographer? at 03/02/2013 - 17:12


I'd go with extension tubes too, and they are available with contacts.
Kenko do them (via SRS) in every mount except Pentax...
I think tubes will be a useful addition but for bugs I worry that having to go closer to the subject might be a disadvantage... Is this the case or is my thinking all wrong?