All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on older Prime vs newer Zoom at 18/07/2011 - 00:02
I've been using my F 35-70mm today on the SFX and MZ-7 and while it's a great lens I tend to use it in P mode (or Av on the MZ-7/K-m with the body controlling the aperture) because the aperture ring is so notchy. I'd love to be able to use it in M on the MZ-7 with the body's control dial handling shutter speed and the aperture ring unlocked, but it's just too balky.
I've also decided that if I limit my lens hunting to SMC Pentax glass I can keep LBA under tight control. They were only made for three years and as a result are rare, their performance and build quality also make people less than inclined to let them go. The 120/2.8 that I have from this series is a gorgeous lens with the advantage (over the more standard 135mm) that you can go down to 1/125 handheld on film without needing to worry too much about camera shake. Add in the nice bright viewfinder at f2.8 and you get a lens I have no intention of ever selling.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on i just got given a pentax p30T at 17/07/2011 - 23:57
I've never had any problems with photographic kit via ebay. Well, I did have a 35mm f2.8 with fungus but the seller was excellent, refunded my return postage, had the lens cleaned, then asked whether I'd like the lens or a refund. As it was otherwise mint I chose to take the lens back.
I'd be looking for an LX in your position. It did replace the K2 as their top of the range film body after all...
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Information at 17/07/2011 - 22:44
Take the 50mm f1.7. The M and A series are optically identical but the A has a plastic aperture ring which is nothing like as easy to get on with as the metal one on the M lens. The plastic one tends to jump two or three clicks when you only want to move it one click, as the parts seem to bind. Meanwhile the metal one is precise and smooth - apply the force for one click and it'll move one click.
In your situation I might look for a Pentax-M 50mm (any version, but the f1.7 is probably the sharpest) to begin with. It's worth looking for ME Supers and other M-series cameras as they often come cheaper than the lens would alone.
Then if you want to expand with quality glass look for the M 28mm f3.5 and M 135mm f3.5. This will give you the classic three primes. You could also consider the M 75-150mm f4 zoom for your telephoto, it's relatively compact and very sharp.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on i just got given a pentax p30T at 17/07/2011 - 22:34
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Welding Mask Glass at 16/07/2011 - 23:39
I use a Go-Pro for that kind of shooting....
Cost? £300 with the motorsport pack, a little less if you have the camera alone without the extra mounting parts to fit it to windscreens/panels. Much safer bet than risking your DSLR (and smaller too).
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Decent underwater housing at 16/07/2011 - 23:34
On a vaguely related note I think I may have tracked down an MX ERC, or at least the back half of one. It comes with what looked to be a minty MX and a Pentax lens of some sort (guessing M 50/1.7 as that seems to have been the most common), a flash, a light meter and a gadget bag. £50 including P&P on an ebay charity sale, which I thought very fair!
My existing MX (which looks like it took on a bear in unarmed combat) will now be the indestructible backup body, fitted with a 50/2 and taken into all sorts of situations where I wouldn't risk anything newer or more valuable. That's assuming the new one is as good as it looks and works properly, of course.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Information at 16/07/2011 - 22:51
AFAIK the K1000 SE had brown leatherette and "SE" stamped into the front of the top plate.
Aside from the thing on the back door that body looks exactly like mine, which I know to be a fairly standard late '70s/early '80s HK-made example.
I wonder how much he'd charge for my rather scruffy Italian-spec ME, with its chrome dot thingy on the front...
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Our favourite ebay dealer at 16/07/2011 - 20:39
He also brushed me off when I complained about a camera case having disappeared in the post. Unfortunately it was too late to get a refund via Paypal and he evidently didn't care!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Our favourite ebay dealer at 16/07/2011 - 18:57
Annoying as that's less than I pay for a roll of Ilford HP5. Just hope Boots will still accept it for processing as otherwise it'll have to be mail order.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 16/07/2011 - 14:51

