All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Fungus attack. at 25/07/2011 - 21:38
It should be fixable, it probably just needs 30+ years of old grease and oil cleaning out and some new oil adding before a bit of adjusting.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Pentax ES I have just acquired at 25/07/2011 - 21:19
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Stand your ground!! at 25/07/2011 - 08:51
Some of the particularly cunning ones now sign up to forums/blogs and post generic favourable comments including their spam links. These are more time consuming for the admins to remove as they strongly resemble a legitimate user, aside from the links.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Mywork. ADVERTS??????? at 25/07/2011 - 08:45
Ponies can be even more vicious from what I hear...
G
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Willing model? at 25/07/2011 - 00:09
My first was a used K1000 in the mid 1990s, in recent years I've been assembling a collection of classic film bodies and lenses. I just find them nicer to use than the later AF bodies. I spent some time today with my MZ-7 (needs some attention as the shutter seems to jam on the first shot of the day, then settles down after a quick tap to unjam it) and found myself wishing I'd taken my KX or KM instead. The viewfinder display on the MZ-7 is a bit hard to read in strong sunlight, compared to the match needles on the KX or the single needle on the KM which were made for bright summer days.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on 1957 and 1958 vintage... at 24/07/2011 - 22:38
Weirdly I have snagged items which I would have thought very desirable by just putting down the starting bid with 5mins to go. Apparently nobody else wanted a minty black ME with 50/1.7 for £20!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on eBay madness at 24/07/2011 - 21:46
A CLA for an LX is not cheap, and I don't think they lend themselves to DIY servicing with small screwdrivers and lighter fuel!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on ebay LX and Tokina 90mm Macro?? who won? at 24/07/2011 - 21:38
There do seem to be a few bidders who throw money about like water, I strongly suspect that they do it in order to intimidate the rest of us - don't try bidding against me because you'll never win. Fine by me, if you really want to pay more than any sane person would consider to be market value then you go for it!
As for daft final bids it happens with everything. I remember a few years ago watching a G scale model railway baggage van bid up to £120. It was a limited edition, but at that time they were still available brand new for about £67!
I will never pay ridiculous sums for used camera gear (why I don't have an LX - my limit for any single used camera or lens is £100).
Comment by Dangermouse posted on eBay madness at 24/07/2011 - 21:25
The FA31 shouldn't have any such trouble as it was designed for full frame use!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Replacement hood for Limiteds at 24/07/2011 - 09:58


I found plain vinegar on a cotton bud worked well to clean the spidery marks off. You'll also need a lens wrench (look on ebay) and a microfibre cloth to polish the elements after cleaning with vinegar. A pair of surgical gloves can be handy to avoid getting fingerprints inside the lens while reassembling it. To be honest the hardest part is usually unscrewing the finishing ring (where it says "SMC Pentax-M 50mm f1.4" around the front element) as they often seem to have been tightened with a torque wrench and won't unscrew! Have a look on the web for some disassembly guides, what I will say is that you don't need to disturb the focussing mechanism on this lens while removing all the elements, so you won't have to fiddle around resetting the infinity focus afterwards.
I have a deep distrust of the leatherette hard cases Pentax offered for most of the older lenses as I suspect they trap moisture. I've had two lenses in said cases, both had or have a mould problem. Meanwhile my other K and M lenses in Lowepro soft cases with a bag of silica gel are fine.