coker

Joined: 14th March 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

coker
Well, Nipper!
Enter no.4 in the Weekly Comp., This Is Me!

Your reflection must be in there somewhere!
Great shot / crop(?)

Roger.

Comment by coker posted on sherwood set up close to robin at 13/03/2011 - 00:05

coker
Thanks, Will, for your post.
However, I don't have W.M.M. on my computer & ,looking at the free downloads for same, I'm not that confident, either in their safety or my I.T. skills, to proceed!

And as this is a rare circumstance, the answer for my friend will be, I think, to open his laptop like a book on-end, to save any damage to his neck!!

Thanks all,

Roger.

Comment by coker posted on Video Rotate at 12/03/2011 - 23:42

coker
Oh no!

Boy, is his neck going to be sore!!!

Best just do a printed card, eh?

Thanks for the bad news, Steve & Gwyn.
Is this such an unusual scenario, or can video only be shot "landscape", effectively?!

Roger.

Comment by coker posted on Video Rotate at 12/03/2011 - 20:44

coker
Help. please!

(Unusually) I took a short video today, to send as a "get well soon" greeting to a dear friend. I shot it "portrait".I can't see a way to rotate it on my screen, it is "landscape"!
I don't want to add to his troubles by having to make him view it sideways!!!


How to rotate video, please.
In PSE9?
In Windows 7, media player?
Thanks,

Coker.

Comment by coker posted on Video Rotate at 12/03/2011 - 19:07

coker
Thanks, Mike.

Compromises all the time!

Do you have any of Orion, taken with your kit, i.e. telescope?

Roger.

Comment by coker posted on Stars at 08/03/2011 - 16:02

coker
Thanks Will.

Yes, I used a tripod(!)

I was after, as near as I could, points of light as opposed to trails.
Would lowering the ISO not have increased the exposure time?
The stars are already just beginning to trail anyway, @ 15secs.
Keeping the exposure time down, with lowISO, would also have meant recording only the brighter stars & I was keen to record as many as poss.

Does all this make any sense?

Roger.

Comment by coker posted on Stars at 08/03/2011 - 14:45

coker
Thanks, Ted.
The Plough wasn't cropped at all.
Orion is about 25% of the original size.

I did set the lens to 18mm when I started & that's what the exif states.
But I've looked & it's set @ about 30.....?

Can you tell from the images what's what, or is the exif always right?

Roger.

Comment by coker posted on Stars at 07/03/2011 - 22:18

coker
Nice & clear tonight!

Orion

Comment Image
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Stars4001Orion_filtered.jpg[/IMG]


The Plough

Comment Image
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Stars4002Ploughcolour_filtered.jpg[/IMG]


Both images:
K7, 18-55 @ 18.
ISO 800, f3.5.

Orion 15.35 secs.,
The plough 14.61secs.


C&C welcome.

Coker

Comment by coker posted on Stars at 07/03/2011 - 22:03

coker
While we're on the subject...

If one were to become seriously interested in photographing birds, what is considered to be the case of long lens, Bigma for example, versus a Pentax scope + a Pentax eyepiece/adaptor (= about £700!) to enable the use of a DSLR.(My K7, say.......)

Coker.

Comment by coker posted on KOWA PROMINAR 500mm F5.6 FL at 07/03/2011 - 19:11

coker
Once I've tended the garden...
Dug the weeds...
It may be a bit too dear...

But Life is Good.

Thanks all, here's to the next....

Roger

Comment by coker posted on Happy Birthday To Me... at 06/03/2011 - 22:52

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo