All Forum Comments
Comment by Cisco posted on PENTAX DA 18-135mm any good? at 20/03/2011 - 10:50
I have taken on board the comments and I have now uploaded a new set of photos using all three lenses and at comparable focal lengths. They are all at ISO100. They are all JPGs **** quality and uploaded full size (thank you BT Infinity). Pixel peepers can download the full size images.
The images were all taken today using a tripod and mirror lock up. One thing I found is that it is surprisingly difficult to set a zoom to a specific intermediate focal length, the markings on the focus ring are a rather rough and ready guide so there are some approximations.
link
Comment by Cisco posted on PENTAX DA 18-135mm any good? at 19/03/2011 - 20:35
In which case it's just down to eye sight !?
Comment by Cisco posted on Focus Help! at 19/03/2011 - 16:47
Comment by Cisco posted on PENTAX DA 18-135mm any good? at 19/03/2011 - 07:13
and different apertures and ISOs used !?
Comment by Cisco posted on PENTAX DA 18-135mm any good? at 18/03/2011 - 23:10
you charged it properly, right?
so that means fully charging, fully discharging, and repeating that for *at least* the first three charges?
.
Quote :
Lithium-ion is a very clean system and does not need priming as nickel-based batteries do. The 1st charge is no different to the 5th or the 50th charge.
.
Comment by Cisco posted on failing lithium battery at 18/03/2011 - 13:04
I bought one to take with me to Spain along with the 55-300mm. Bit annoying having (what I thought were) better lenses but Ryanairs hand luggage weight restrictions are mean to say the least.
Was there a problem then ? Were you not able to take them ??
.
Comment by Cisco posted on PENTAX DA 18-135mm any good? at 17/03/2011 - 19:46
Try loading it in LR or PS and saving with a different colour profile
Comment by Cisco posted on New monitor problem at 15/03/2011 - 10:46
just a thought
Comment by Cisco posted on New monitor problem at 15/03/2011 - 08:30
Comment by Cisco posted on Smeggy's Lightroom Workflow at 14/03/2011 - 22:27
Same as on the new 35/2.4 !?