ChrisA

Joined: 4th January 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

ChrisA
Quote:
It would be interesting to try the manual stop down metering as well... maybe that's been resolved too
Nope.

Comment by ChrisA posted on K10D Firmware 1.30 available for download. at 09/07/2007 - 10:46

ChrisA
Just remembered I also used a cable release for all the tripod shots.

Makes it easier to interact with the subjects while you're getting them to all look your way and means that you won't shake the tripod pressing the button.

I'd use the remote now - which you could also use to get yourself into some of the shots. Presumably, you're a friend of the couple so it would be nice for them to see you in some of the shots too.

If you do this, put the camera into manual so that when you're done composing the frame, and move away from the viewfinder, the exposure doesn't all go to pot when the sun shines in through it.

Comment by ChrisA posted on Help & advice seriously required from all Please read !! at 04/07/2007 - 18:40

ChrisA
Quote:
as I need the experience and they need a photographer as they cant afford a pro.
I've done two weddings on this basis - not recently, it was in my Super A / ME Super days. A couple of things come to mind.

If you possibly can, beg borrow or steal another body. As well as a backup (if your K10 dies and it's all you have, you are totally f***ed), it's useful for candids while you're setting up the tripod shots. Have it round your neck with a wide to medium zoom on it, set to a highish ISO. Then if you spot something while people are faffing you can grab it.

Add a spare charged battery to your list of bits to have with you.

If it's a sunny day, the harsh contrasts you get from the early afternoon sun are an absolute nightmare (think of faces under hats!) - and because the eye has a much higher dynamic range than the camera, it will look much worse on the picture than it looks to your eye. You'll need fill-in flash more than you'd think.

I found for the first one I couldn't work as quickly as I'd have liked, since I had no experience. The growing impatience from the guests added pressure I could have well done without.

So for the second one I did the big groups first (the ones with people in that wouldn't appear in the smaller groups). Then they were able to go and get a drink while I concentrated on the small groups and bride/groom poses.

Finally, remember one thing above all else:

It is the couple's day, and the couple's lifelong memories you're building. If you have to keep a few of the guests hanging about a little bit in order to ensure that you have enough time to do what you have to do, make sure you take it - people are nice at weddings usually, and will cut you the slack you need. And be nice, but don't allow guests to crowd you when you're doing the tripod shots. It's your responsibility to get it right, not theirs, so take command if necessary, nicely, obviously.

I found it a huge pressure. But both went really well, and the sense of pride I felt when the couples were really pleased was a real rush.

Good luck!

Comment by ChrisA posted on Help & advice seriously required from all Please read !! at 04/07/2007 - 18:30

ChrisA
Quote:
So much depends on how you are metering the image and your interpretation of that information. I usually try to find the happy medium between the two extremes and find the average, i.e. If the highlight is reading f22.0 and the shadows f5.6 I generally shoot at f11.0. That way I have split the difference and have more latitude when imported in to Adobe RAW and then PS.
Thanks for the tip.

Comment by ChrisA posted on K10D, D200, D80 & 30D at 05/07/2007 - 08:15

ChrisA
Quote:
MattMatic wrote:
Quote:
The other thing I garnered was the importance of understanding the latitude of the sensor in regards to extreme highlights to shadow detail.
What did you determine the latitude to be? It'd be interesting to hear your experience on this.
That is a good question. When exposed correctly and using RAW, I can say a spectrum of 9 to 10 stops.
So do you expose for half way up this range, or is it non-linear?

Comment by ChrisA posted on K10D, D200, D80 & 30D at 05/07/2007 - 07:49

ChrisA
Quote:
Pete, for the last time will you please get out of your thick skull the notion that JPEGs are bad on the K10D. They are not! Arguably they are better than on any other brand because they are sharpened less in-camera, thus giving you more flexibility. You can't unsharpen an over-sharpened image, but you can sharpen an under-sharpened image.
Maybe it's just that Pentax is simply the wrong brand for Pete.

Everything he posts suggests that he likes the over-sharpened default look from other brands.

If that's his preference, maybe he'd be happier flogging his K10D and getting a Canon - or a Sony Alpha, which even has shake reduction. PC Pro, experts that they are in all things photographic, have it on their A list now.

Comment by ChrisA posted on K10D, D200, D80 & 30D at 04/07/2007 - 17:57

ChrisA
Quote:
Hi All

I've noticed that on my DL2 i can get 93 RAW and 341 JPEG images. But on my K10D i only get 62 RAW and 205 JPEG why is this. I'm using a Extreme lll 1gb card

6/10 = 0.6 is approximately the ratio of the number of pixels in the DL2 sensor to the number of pixels in the K10D sensor.

205/341 = 0.6, so no surprises there for the JPG.

I'm curious as to why it's 62 RAW and not 56, however.

Presumably, the camera makes a guess at how many pictures it can fit on the card - it can't know exactly in advance because not all image files are the same size, not even RAW files (PEF anyway).

So maybe the way it works out its guess is slightly different between the cameras.

Comment by ChrisA posted on SD Card at 03/07/2007 - 21:19

ChrisA
Quote:
(tethered usb)
Leaving the K10D connected via its USB connection still seems to drain the battery in only a few hours.

Comment by ChrisA posted on undocumented k10 feature.... at 03/07/2007 - 17:32

ChrisA
Quote:

Oops, meant FAJ

It is silver/black, not the all black.

Yes, that's the one I've got. £40 a real bargain then

Comment by ChrisA posted on 300m Lens needed or over at 03/07/2007 - 07:29

ChrisA
Quote:
I found a FA 75-300 in a local shop (second hand) for £40 (if I recall correctly).
<slap>

Edit: oo is that different from the FAJ?

Phew...

2nd edit.. hey, which one is better?

George?

Comment by ChrisA posted on 300m Lens needed or over at 02/07/2007 - 23:32

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo