All Forum Comments
Comment by ChrisA posted on Pentax press conference 23/8 at 23/08/2007 - 13:00
Nothing yet I hope that it wasn't just a rumour - I have read about it on a couple of sites now, from different sources, but no sign yet, unless they were just hyping the new Optio announced today
Comment by ChrisA posted on Pentax press conference 23/8 at 23/08/2007 - 12:49
Anyone else heard about this press conference tomorrow? WOnder what it's about. Folks are getting excited. Maybe it is the news Benjikan has been teasing us with
Comment by ChrisA posted on Pentax press conference 23/8 at 22/08/2007 - 14:05
Hi All
This is my first post. I am getting back into photography after a long time. Bought a digital compact a couple of years ago but not satified. I am considering buying a Pentax K10D. I have 28mm, 50mm and 70-210 K lenses off an old Cosina CS3.
Can I use these in stopped down mode on the new K10? If so what kind of results will I get?
Looking forward to your help.
You can use any K mount lens with the K10D. However, those without an A setting on the aperture ring (which enables the body to set the aperture) will give exposure problems when using stop-down metering.
There's been lots of discussion about this here: check out the following threads as a start:
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3867
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4222
A search will throw up some others too.
Some seem to have cured the problem without other side effects by using an alternative focusing screen.
A-series lenses and later, from Pentax and other manufacturers, are fine in all modes since the aperture can be set by the body.
Metering wide open is fine even with pre-A lenses, so if you do this and then calculate the exposure yourself for the smaller aperture, it's also fine, albeit not as convenient.
HTH.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Old K Lenses on K10D at 22/08/2007 - 07:54
If it fell in slow motion, surely you have a picture of it, haven't you?
Comment by ChrisA posted on "Most useful and unusual photographic accessory" award at 21/08/2007 - 09:05
Picture the scene, if you will. A spider, hanging on a strand of web from the ceiling.
'Aha, where's the camera and extension tubes', is my instinctive reaction.
I put down my glass of wine - on the banister, while I chase the critter up and down the stairs. My first two attempts are rubbish, and he's paying out the line... so I run down the stairs to catch him before he goes back up again.
He pauses in mid-air, I frame my shot... and just before I fire, he's off up the web again. So I turn, and in my haste to beat him to the top of the stairs...
... knock the wine glass, about a third full, off its perch. It falls in slow motion, but still fast enough for its contents to go everywhere.
'Oh dear' I say (or something like that, I don't recall).
Strangely, the photographic moment is past. Some time later, much kitchen towel for blotting used, 1001 sprayed and scrubbing scrubbed, the carpet is now damp, but hopefully clean (1001 is marvellous stuff).
After I'd done cleaning up, I looked for the spider. On the ceiling, out of reach, obviously... and I thought I heard a faint snigger.
His days are numbered...
Comment by ChrisA posted on "Most useful and unusual photographic accessory" award at 20/08/2007 - 21:32
Or is it something with spores everywhere, and needs the right environment to grow?
I haven't got any lenses with it at the moment, but more have been passing through my hands recently, and I wouldn't want to take any risks.
Should I quarantine new acquisitions for a while?
Another vote for Picasa - I find it invaluable for organising images and creating CDs for proofs.
Matt
The only annoying thing is that AFAICS there's only one import location, so if you use it to pull photos from the SD card, it puts them all in the same place.
I use Adobe's photo downloader to do the initial transfer, since it creates a dated subfolder. Then I let Picasa auto-detect the new files and add them to its catalogue.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Raw - Thumpnails in Windows at 20/08/2007 - 12:55
I shot the eclipse with the Bigma, but had a dodgy tripod so the photos aren't that good. Haven't tried it since I got the new tripod - I don't hink I've seen the moon for months due to the weather. However I was not that impressed with the Bigma for the moon shots, but that may just be me.
Just wondering, since if the exposure was more than a second or so, the rotation of the Earth would cause significant blurring.
Of the couple of hundred moon shots I've taken, the vast majority of which are complete rubbish, the most consistent problem I found (other than overexposing, which is all too easy) was simply poor focusing. It doesn't take much to ruin it.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Taking pics of a lunar eclipse at 21/08/2007 - 21:40
PS perhaps with a 2x converter I could really see the craters. Vic
In my limited experience (Sigma 400mm, and 400mm x2), what you gain with the teleconverter in image size you more than lose with the degradation that comes from putting those extra bits of glass in the way.
So even taking into account the greater enlargement required, I've had better results from the bare Sigma 400 than with the TC.
Haven't had a good clear night at full moon or close to it since getting the Pentax SMC-A 400mm F5.6, so can't compare yet.
This is about the best I've done so far:
http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t244/chris5gd/Public/IMGP2385-1b.jpg
Edit: replaced with a link. Sorry, it's a bit wide for here.
Comment by ChrisA posted on Taking pics of a lunar eclipse at 21/08/2007 - 20:58


I'll make as much use of the K10D and *ist before investing more money on bodies..