All Forum Comments
Comment by chirpy posted on Pentax DA* 300mm F4 + K20D at 04/04/2008 - 21:31
I bought it with the intention of using it and the DA70mm Ltd as my walkaround lenses. I've got tired of zooms for now. It weighs about the same as my Sigma 180mm f/3.5 1:1 Macro, so I'll be sticking it on a monopod. The pictures today were hand-held and my hand is a little achy from gripping it.
I've got more shots, but that's all I've had time to process so far.
Comment by chirpy posted on Pentax DA* 300mm F4 + K20D at 04/04/2008 - 18:11
1. PF is very well under control at F4, there is some in extreme conditions but it seems to disappear after F4.5. Nothing like the higher PF levels that I've seen from the DA* 200mm from examples of others (I don't have that one)
2. No sign of vignetting
3. Lovely and quiet
4. Lovely and quick to focus
5. Close focus of 1.4m is very handy
6. Very light
Testing close focus:

f/5.6 1/250 ISO100
Testing for PF and vignetting (although this is at f5.6, I didn't see any vignetting at f/4):

f/5.6 1/1500 ISO100
Testing DOF at f4:

f/4 1/750 ISO100
100% crop test:

Comment by chirpy posted on Pentax DA* 300mm F4 + K20D at 04/04/2008 - 16:25
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=K20D&w=all
These are my feeble K20D offerings:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=k20d&w=9000862%40N07
Comment by chirpy posted on K20 QUALITY SHOTS? at 03/04/2008 - 21:54
Comment by chirpy posted on My DA* 50-135 is a 'Write Off' according to Pentax at 03/04/2008 - 21:51
It couldn't allow regular lenses to become SDM, as its a technology built in to each lens.
Comment by chirpy posted on New DA* 300mm F4 + test shot at 03/04/2008 - 21:48
Comment by chirpy posted on New DA* 300mm F4 + test shot at 03/04/2008 - 17:55
I also tried it with the Kenko 1.5x converter and SDM still works well, though I do wonder how the SR will cope as I've not had much luck with IQ with using various TC's with any lens I have.
I'm still waiting to see what the mysterious "Rear Converter for SDM" actually is on the Pentax roadmap.
Comment by chirpy posted on New DA* 300mm F4 + test shot at 03/04/2008 - 16:57
Comment by chirpy posted on VEHO 8gb SDHC card ? at 02/04/2008 - 21:45
1. The larger sensor makes a big difference to me as with wildlife shots I often need to crop the image to get additional magnification
2. The noise you get in shadow at higher ISO's is very nice compared to the K10D. It's much more grainy and is very very easy to clean up with some NR in PP. The K10D tended to look blurry when using NR compared to how the K20D looks. Again this helps me in low light situations where I need a fast speed and so need to use higher ISO.
I'm not sure whether there's any real AF difference between the two, though I do tend to get better AF accuracy that I did with the GX10 (less FF or BF issues that I seemed to get in the past).
Weight and size-wise they're basically the same, with larger battery and SD card compartment opening levers.
The downside of the K20D - very large RAW files - had to move to 4GB SDHC SanDisk Extreme III cards to cope
Comment by chirpy posted on K10D vs K20D at 02/04/2008 - 11:10


Thanks Chirpy If you ever want to sell that sigma 180 macro keep me in mind
BTW do you have a gold mine in your backyard : You sure are getting a nice collection together.
We made it through the bubble bursting on the internet and kept some money aside for fun stuff. I've been told that this is it for the next 5 years, though.
Yeah.
Right