beakynet

Joined: 31st October 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

beakynet
I use the Velbon Ultra Maxi - comes with either a pan head or a ball head and I have found it to be good for light weight travel. Though not the most sturdy, it sifices for use with my K10D and 18-200mm Sigma. However, I would not want to use it with anything much heavier than that. It is very versitile and above all LIGHT which is what I wanted. I don't think there is a smaller full height pod.

http://www.velbon-tripod.com/ultra_maxi.htm

Comment by beakynet posted on Best lightweight Travel Tripod at 25/02/2008 - 09:46

beakynet
Quote:
Within a month I'll be travelling to Nepal, a friend of mine wants me to buy some glass or even a DSLR in Kathmandu.
Is it a wise thing to do ? I know there can be problems with warranty.

I've been in Nepal several times and stayed in Kathmandu, I've never seen 'reliable' stores for photographics.
Any suggestions ?
One thing to consider is buying on route. When I used to go to Nepal I always passed through Dubai! A great place for camera equipment then and probably still now.

In Kathmandu I found it hard to find decent processing! That was back in 1997 when I was last there.

Comment by beakynet posted on Buying equipment in Nepal at 21/02/2008 - 20:11

beakynet
Quote:
There's little advantage to posting huge pictures because they can't be viewed properly....

800 pixels wide it is then, and I'll post a reminder of that in the next competition thread. Anyone who posts wider, will be deleted, maximum delete....

I just went with the flow, noting that most were at 1024 on the longest and chose that! I will downsize and remember that in the future.

Anyway, if a picture is good enough it will be fine at 800!

Comment by beakynet posted on Weekly Competition # 33 "My Town................" at 25/02/2008 - 11:12

beakynet
Comment Image

View over London from near Horniman Park - Wembly Arch is just visable.

K10D, ISO100, 1/80 at F13 and 55mm

Comment by beakynet posted on Weekly Competition No. 33: "My Town . . . . ." at 24/02/2008 - 21:28

beakynet
Quote:
Backup to external drive(s) AND DVD discs
Make sure you only back up to DVD Rs as re-writable CDs and DVDs data deterates with time due to the nature of the dye used.

Comment by beakynet posted on Storage space with raw files? at 18/02/2008 - 14:06

beakynet
Quote:
I would try to set up a good test situation first. Taking pictures through glass will nearly always affect lens performance, and the longer the focal length the worst the affect will be. Get outside and try again using a tripod. Try several shots with slightly varied focus 'cos I find I can't always trust my eyes 100% on a matt focusing screen. Try subjects at different distances too. I don't think you will get brilliant results from a front converter though.
I too am yet to be convinced, however the obgective of the first test was to look at auto focus capability and effective lens speed - both proved better with the front converter! Now it is time for the image quality tests. I am planning to shoot as close to identical mm with and without the converter. All tests will be done using AF to see if the AF function is affected at all.

Comment by beakynet posted on An experiment at 21/02/2008 - 10:10

beakynet
Quote:
Try again with a tripod (SR off) and no window and use a shutter speed of the reciprocal of the effective focal length. EG: For an effective focal length of 900mm, use 1/1000th of a second as a minimum. Vignetting can be fixed in PP.
Roll on the next bright sunny day!

Vignetting can be resolved, however, the objective is to get the best in camera - a true alternative to a standard 2x converter.

I think I had SR off due to the lack of communication of the true focal length which is required for the best SR results.

Comment by beakynet posted on An experiment at 17/02/2008 - 18:52

beakynet
Quote:
Have to agree with Tyr, the image quality from the Tamron is way ahead of the Bower. The Bower gives a smeared effect, looks more like a lensbaby.

Dan
That is true, however with the Bower, the set up is much harder to hand hold (on count that it is heavier than the Tamron), that is why I need to do more tests - the shutterspeed needed to be closer to 1/400 to ensure camera shake was catered for. I plan to shoot with the 70-210 at equivalent of about 200 for all the test shots to see the difference - this time I will use the tripod.

I have ordered the step up ring and will hopefully get it within a week and will post the results then.

Comment by beakynet posted on An experiment at 17/02/2008 - 17:34

beakynet
Not having £600 to purchase the Sigma lens I wanted and being very dissatisfied with my 2x converter I spotted this for $99 and decided to give it a go:
Comment Image
Comment Image

It is a Bower 2x converter that goes on the front of the lens! (62mm thread)

Here are my test shots (only to illustrate speed and magnification, all hend held and taken through a window):

Comment Image

Sigma 18-200 @200 f9.0 ISO 100 1/320

Comment Image

+Tamron 2x @400 f9.0 ISO400 1/200
(Focus has some trouble locking on, slower and more noisy)

Comment Image

+Bower @400 f9.0 ISO100 1/250
(vinyeting visable but focus unaffected and much better light performance)

Comment Image

Sigma UCII 70-210 55mm filter thread.
+bower @420 f9.0 ISO100 1/200
(No step up ring so held infront of lens)

Colclusion so far is that the vinyetting makes the Bower unusable on the Digital only lens but if I have gone for a bigger thread size on the Bower, that might have been less of an issue. However, on the 70-210 35mm image circle lens (I can't do a full test till I have the step up ring) I seem to have a very usable 140 to 420 zoom that performs much better than the Tamron 2x converter. Weight isn't bad either. and this cost me only about £64!

Once I have the step up ring I will post some more test shots - I may even use my tripod this time!

Comment by beakynet posted on An experiment at 16/02/2008 - 23:35

beakynet
Quote:
OMG i look like an idiot already when i'm in the bush with my macro, can you imagine what i would look like wandering around with that
Put it this way, if it is the only option that can give you p-TTL, would you really mind?

Anyway, big camera, big flash - people always assume you are a pro!

Comment by beakynet posted on Macro Flash at 13/02/2008 - 15:56

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo