All Forum Comments
Comment by beakynet posted on shooting indoors at 24/06/2008 - 17:06
What irks me is that I have just finished scanning the albums of photos my grandfather took in Shanghai in the 30s. The photos have lasted almost 80 years - some were kept in quite appalling conditions - yet I reckon that the scans will have to be copied between media several times if they are likely to survive another 80 years.
That's what is called 'progress' these days.
Richard
I am currently using Verbatim double layer DVD+R in addition to an external hard drive.
Has anyone tried BluRay? How reliable are they?
Comment by beakynet posted on DVD Archival for Photos at 27/06/2008 - 00:35
Thanks all - can't wait to get home....
I also find it better to use in conjunction with the battery grip.
Enjoy!
Comment by beakynet posted on WOW - just got my DA* 50-135 at 20/06/2008 - 14:52
The other alternative and highly regarded is the 16-45 f4 and is only £199 (SYS Microsystems). Personally I will be looking at the 17-70 and the 16 -50 DA* SDM (£469 from SRS) and replacements. So far the 16-50 is winning out due to the faster 2.8, the full water and dust sealing and that I will be able to use it on older cameras. Though I am very interested in the 17-70 because of its good focal length range.
Comment by beakynet posted on Replacement Kit Lens? at 16/06/2008 - 13:14
Try changing your viewing angle on the work monitor and see what happens!
Comment by beakynet posted on Raw editing, my photos look very dull, advice appreciated! at 16/06/2008 - 12:57
It is possible to regain some highlight detail but usually only from RAW files where as shadows contain better details, even in JPGs, though it can result in noise.
I also have set my K10D to 1/3 stops for EV (the default is 1/2 stops) as I believe this gave me better control.
The exposure will also depend on the metering mode used.
Comment by beakynet posted on K10D - underexposed images at 16/06/2008 - 13:07
Spot meter from the trees (background), spot metre from the water and you will likely find a several stop difference - that said, what about combining the two images for background exposure and forgroung exposure using layers and masking?
Comment by beakynet posted on This proves I have no clue at 16/06/2008 - 11:19
Hi George, now that I've viewed it on my PC screen, it does look a lot duller than it did at home. I am confused, so have posted a seperate thread to try and help. Thanks all for the comments guys, they are helpful!
I think the only improvement would have been eye contact.
Comment by beakynet posted on Crow - 31mm Limited at 16/06/2008 - 13:18
Sorry but there is not enough D & D in the image for it portray the theme, By adjusting the curves you could have brought out more of the tonal range, a little flat as it is.
I was interested in your comment about not enought D & D, I though the fact it was set in a grave yard implied one of the 'D's !
Great judging - For one, I think it will help push my pictures (especially B&W) forward. I took the image for this comp and I am more inspired to do more B&W as a result - Job done I would say!
Comment by beakynet posted on Weekly Competition No.49 DECAY & DERELICTION at 16/06/2008 - 09:35


hi from sanderscapes.com does anyone know the best settings for shooting indoors i.e living rooms etc i am quite new to the pentax k10 i moved over from canon yuk! .At the moment i am using TAv mode which automaticaly adjusts the iso i set a range from 100 to 320 .i just wondered if anyone knew of any better settings to use such as a standard indoor aperture maybe say f8.I find myself having to take a couple of test shots then adjust the camera accordingly before taking the final shots by which time my kids have got bored and run off .Thanks for any help
I also use fill in flash (set to slow sync) and that often gives better exposure though I usually do this with a hotshoe mounted flash with a bounce head to soften the light.