beakynet

Joined: 31st October 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

beakynet
timothyw wrote:
Bump
Just to update, I now have the box for the FAJ 75-300...
Any offers? Shame to be leaving these great lenses on the shelf!
I'm interested in the FJA - PM sent.

Comment by beakynet posted on FS: Telephoto Zooms - Vivitar Series 1 Komine 70-210, Pentax FAJ 75-300, Pentax FA 70-200 Powerzoom! at 05/10/2011 - 13:49

beakynet
Not me, I just paid the water bill

It's on my wish list though not till the Q to K adaptor is avaliable!

Comment by beakynet posted on 'Q' anybody? at 05/10/2011 - 13:34

beakynet
The AF200t looks good, and I have found one for under £30.

My search also turned up the Metz 24AF1, but is seems to be only pTTL with no manual controls. Also the Metz 20 c2 auto/manual flash. Does anyone have any experiance with these two flashes on a K10/20/7 or 5?

Comment by beakynet posted on Can any one recomend a small flash unit? at 07/09/2011 - 14:03

beakynet
The first camera I got for my son (aged 4 at the time) was the Optio E35. I used lithium batteries and it went great guns - one set lasted about 6 months! Now the zoom buttons don't work. Next birthday (8th!) he will be getting an black Optio I-10, cost me £78 brand new. I will see hew he does with it, as he really looked after the old E35 - I made sure he had a good case with it and knew to put it back in there and that he was responsible for looking after it! He also likes using my K7 and the K10 before that! He even took a winning picture with the K10 when he was 3 1/2 - made into a post card!

My youngest (5 next birthday) will be getting his first camera, an Optio E90 so I can use lithium AAs again! That was only £58!

I did think about the W series but discounted in favour of the cheaper E and I series.

Comment by beakynet posted on Best Optio for a 5 year old at 07/09/2011 - 13:34

beakynet
I have a 500mm mirror lens - that would make an eye watering 2,750mm f8 lens!

Suddenly the Q looks even more fun!

Comment by beakynet posted on Who says Pentax don't make long lenses at 07/09/2011 - 13:24

beakynet
Smeggypants wrote:
I can't see the point or the target market of this camera.?
I think it is the same target market that the Pentax 110 went after. The idea of a camera as a fashion excessory started a long time ago!

Smeggypants wrote:
But also if you are embarking on an outing where photography is a secondary issue do you really want to go out with a camera system, like the Q, with a bunch of interchangeable lenses and so on?
I used to take my 110 out, not with a bunch of lenses though, just the zoom! IQ was not anything to compare to my Program A. Was it fun, yes! And that was the point for me.

These days, I carefully choose the lenses for the occation so I am not carrying too much - 1 lens and a flash or two lenses. If I had this little camear I could choose the camera for the occation too! And possibly do some of that street photograph I have always wanted to do but never had the bottle with a large SLR!

There is only one thing I think is missing - weather seals!

Comment by beakynet posted on Hands-On Q in AP at 07/09/2011 - 13:15

beakynet
I currently have two powerful Metz flash guns but would like to add a 3rd flash to my collection, the flash needs to be small and I have no requirement for a tilt/pan head. Auto zoom would be a bonus and the guide number must be better than the 11 of the built in flash on my K7.

It will also need to have a manual seting so that I can select lower power for manual off camera flash using wireless triggers.

Comment by beakynet posted on Can any one recomend a small flash unit? at 24/08/2011 - 14:19

beakynet
I have a Tamron 75 to 300 that I used to use for macro, 'til I aquired a propper macro! It gave very good results and 1:2 macro at 180 to 300mm and the operating distance was just good enough to use the on board flash for fill lighting.

So, yes the 300 is an alternative.

Comment by beakynet posted on Pentax DA 300mm for butterfly/dragonfly photography at 24/08/2011 - 13:57

beakynet
Anvh wrote:
Frogfish wrote:
nd it needs adaptors like yesterday.
Why does it need adaptors?
I mean the IQ is probably not the best and since you've lenses that need an adapter i also assume you've a camera that has the right mount with better image quality, so why do it?
Also the sensor is very small so it change the angle of view of the lens drastically!
The only adapter i might want to use is one for the m4/3, for the other the mounts the register distance or the lenses are too large for the Q.
The only adaptor I would want would be to attach to System 110 lenses! And that is only because I have them all except the 18mm Pan focus!

What would people pay for this camera? Personally I would peek at £300!

Comment by beakynet posted on Q Reviews at 24/08/2011 - 13:44

beakynet
Is there a pattern to the images that cannot be displayed? i.e. where they all the ones taken in portrait? If this is the case, then the image may have been rotated on the card (presumably when you coppied them across), the camera then sees this as an edited image and can't display.

Comment by beakynet posted on k5 "this image cannot be displayed" at 24/08/2011 - 13:35

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo