Anvh

Joined: 4th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Anvh
Thank you Terry.
I wanted to try out a new toy and the weather was good and simply didn't intend to shoot indoors so didn't want to make more then nesacary, even the zoo didn't knew before friday they had a little baby

next time I take the monopod with my, I normally do except this time.
It's the same as seeing the most extraordinary thing and you didn't brought the camera with you

Comment by Anvh posted on Have a Little Faith In Me at 14/04/2009 - 11:36

Anvh
terje-l wrote:
Number 1 is very good. The others look a little soft to me. Were they shot through glass?
Karl wrote:
Stefan no.1 is by far the best for me and is very good. All of the others lack 'punch' ie, they look a bit washed out.
All the others were shot with the TC I had it for free from Kriss and wanted to try it out, some photos came out fair enough like the elephant but yes it does lack some punch.
The TC won't be used so often as I wanted to do after seeing the result on the computer, certainly the bokeh isn't nice. It does doubles the magnification of the macro lens so will use it for that from now on.

This one was taken 2 month before these
Comment Image

Model: PENTAX K10D
Shutter Speed: 1/40 second
F Number: F/5.6
Focal Length: 100 mm
ISO Speed: 400

Much better don't you think?
I've redone that shot a month ago but still need to upload them

Comment by Anvh posted on More zoo photos at 14/04/2009 - 11:30

Anvh
With lightroom I can chose my own metadata information, I've now set it so that it includes my name and other thins but you can make more presets if you want and you can set custom naming of the file.

Maybe you can also do it with the Adobe DNG converter link
I've no need for it so didn't try it

Comment by Anvh posted on Raw file format - changing at 14/04/2009 - 11:18

Anvh
shim wrote:
I would treat any claims regarding storage life with suspicion. When CD's first came out they were claiming over 100 years storage. The warning in the Toshiba manual is to back up the data on the card regularly.

shim
Well the music CD's you buy at a shop do last that long since they arent burned.

About how long DVD will last, it depends on the sealing method, reflective layer, organic dye makeup, where it was manufactured, and your storage practices. if you keep all media out of direct sunlight, in a nice cool dry dark place, in acid-free plastic containers; this will triple the lifetime of any media.
Normall DVD's will last from 30 to 100 years and rewritable up to 30 years. Also DVD+R will last longer then DVD-R because of technical reasons, error correction, ‘wobble’ tracking and the data writing method is inferior compared to DVD+R

But if you rewrite a rewritable they will wear down so they last no as long.

The Taiyo Yuden ‘Super Cyanine’ DVDs are considered the best for long storage because of there chemical stability. THey sell them under another brand and these are the brands link
I've verbatim and they still look very pretty if compared to some very cheap DVDs I've.

ps. the last part was copy and paste since we already had this discusion 1 month ago link

Comment by Anvh posted on How do you store all these memory cards ? at 14/04/2009 - 11:08

Anvh
Hardgravity wrote:
So a 1.5x is better than a 2x if you want to keep auto focus?

I'm interested in this topic as I've considered a TC in the past, tried manual ones, but not been convinced as to their worth.
The AF does his metering through the lens, since a TC disperse the light and adds some extra glass to go through the AF has a very hard time.
An 2x tc disperse the light/image with a lost of 2 stops but a 1.5x disperse the light less resulting in a 1 stop of light lost.
I believe the AF needs atleast f6.7 or f8 to really work reliable, it also depends on the subject and the amount of light of course.

edit:typo

Comment by Anvh posted on Kenko Teleplus DG 2X MC7 Teleconverter - Pentax AF at 14/04/2009 - 10:51

Anvh
welcome to the forum

you cant go wrong with any macro lens, the tamron is also a good one I've been told.

Comment by Anvh posted on Snapper from Cwmbran wales at 13/04/2009 - 23:57

Anvh
Welcome and happy belated easter

Comment by Anvh posted on Hello from southern Scotland at 13/04/2009 - 23:56

Anvh
Atleast do it not to often, it will rewrite your whole card and since they "only" last several thousands of rewrites. I will do it monthly or so.

You can see it as renewing your bookshelf, by throwing away every book and your old bookshelf and place a fresh new one.

Comment by Anvh posted on SD & SDHC maintenance at 13/04/2009 - 23:55

Anvh
Sdeve wrote:
A better question might be, why say it at all?

I have a sneaking suspicion that it is an 'in' word, first used to indicate that the user is a 'serious' photographer, and somewhat above the common herd. I never once heard that word in my 35mm days, even when I was at my most earnest.
What other word would you have for bokeh?
Unsharpness, blur, fuzzy, out of focus, it just doesn't sound as a good thing while with bokeh you think about something positive.
A good bokeh is also very smooth and as least distracting as possible and emphasizing the subject.

You're indeed right that you didn't heared it in the "old days" since the word didn't excist before 1996

Comment by Anvh posted on Old Chestnut at 13/04/2009 - 20:30

Anvh
piotro wrote:
Point is to have a "difficult" photo to play with...
Well you asked for it but indeed I will get it down for you, sorry

I uploaded the base since someone can see if it's interesting or not so that they don't need to download a 10mb file without knowing what they will get.

If you open it in a raw converter you get to see the file with the cameras preset so why not?

Comment by Anvh posted on Raw Challenge #1 at 13/04/2009 - 19:18

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo