All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Wide angle lens distortion at 25/05/2010 - 19:08
Why have I brought this up ? Well my understanding is that there are questions being asked about the questions used in Court by one of the legal team, which some have indicated may have been leading questions and caused the little girl to change the way she gave her story .
About what happened now is different since you're not directly involved and you've no idea how the interrogation went so it's hard to say anything for outsiders but it's a question I think that needs to be investigated to be honest.
Very very difficult area to be talking about - having experienced being a 10 year old boy ( 1956 ),I am saddened to think that,in this day and age,children are so focused upon and knowledgeable about things that to me were unthinkable at that age.
Yes, I am sure I was involved in " show me yours etc" and "doctors and nurses" etc - but NEVER in my recollection was there any desire to be any more than curious and the fear of parental recrimination was sufficient to take the desire out of going any further ( even if I had experienced any desire ! ).
I think maybe parental responsibiliy needs to be addressed
Here Tony read this. link
I believe that's along the line what you say or not?
"Did none of the members of the jury have a normal childhood? Did none of these ever show their 'thingies' to other children behind the bike shed? If every male child were arrested for playing doctors and nurses, then I doubt if there'd be a single bloke walking the streets free today."
---------------------------------------------
"Is there any other period in our history, or any other country in the world, where the pre-pubescent fumblings of children would result in a rape trial? We bombard children with sexual imagery and then are surprised when they show interest in what it means. It is astonishing that they were convicted but even more amazing is that it even came to court at all."
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 25/05/2010 - 19:02
It strikes me they were far too young to be charged for that 'crime'. Mind you I don't know all the details. But in general I don't think kids should be treated in the same way as adults.
And them in a way that will haunt them for the rest of their live seems to be wrong.
They probably don't even know what they were doing and that only the motehr saw it is rape... of course we dont know all the details.
[quote:3496ace15f="Pentaxophile"I heard a report on the radio about a norwegian case similar to the infamous Bulger case. The mother of a child murder victim told the reporter very adamantly that she did not expect the killer to have been locked up like an adult, even though the youth, who had received psychological treatment rather than a jail term, and still lived locally, had started to harass other members of her family.
I was very impressed by the way she didn't give in to what would be an understandable desire for retribution.[/quote]Didn't hear about that one and indeed the victim is pretty strong.
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 25/05/2010 - 16:20
I mean if you want a natural distortion of the face you would want a lens that does not "magnify" I thought 50mm was that lens but that it simply looked better with a longer lens, there are even pro's that use 600mm lenses and use a megaphone to communicate. That surely isn't my style but they must be using those focal length for a reason.
I even have a portrait book that suggest using a 200mm lens.
Comment by Anvh posted on Best focal length for portrait at 25/05/2010 - 16:03
Bit more outside view. link
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 25/05/2010 - 15:50
I'm wandering what you've to say what focal length is the best for portrait and why?
Hopefully someone here can also explain the tele-effect a bit more and why that's bad
Comment by Anvh posted on Best focal length for portrait at 25/05/2010 - 15:38
Stefan, explain "dirty" shots further? I am looking for advice on how to test and what to look for. All my other lenses either came new with a camera or were bought secondhand.This is my first purchase of a new lens and I don't want to waste my money.
Alistair
So take a simple shots of the racks, they are square so it's easy to see any distortions you can expect and than simply take some shots to see how the lens handles and if it's what you expect it to be.
You can always ask if it's al right if you bring the lens back if it didn't fulfil your expectations, most are quite willing to do that, that's the reason I buy lenses from the local shop here.
Comment by Anvh posted on How to shop test a lens? at 25/05/2010 - 13:34
There are enough sites that show which one is sharper and what not so simply go to the shop and test how a lens handles in your hands and you can take some dirty shots of the racks to see the distortion.
Comment by Anvh posted on How to shop test a lens? at 25/05/2010 - 12:48
For dust the Pentax kit will do or articbutterfly, you can also use a bellow but I never had much success with that.
For greases you need to use a liquid based cleaning like swabs link
Comment by Anvh posted on Sensor cleaning for my K-x at 25/05/2010 - 11:58
Also I've found it exceptionally difficult to adjust accurately for lenses with focal length less than about 28mm (any hints gratefully accepted).
Comment by Anvh posted on Focus adjustment on K20D at 25/05/2010 - 11:44


Hopefully pentax take the time to make some profiles after all they have them already for the K7 and the KX.
With the K7 you also get the K20D so they only need to do the K10D and they would have almost all cameras of the last 3 years.