All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Price of an F* /FA* 600mm f4 at 21/06/2010 - 22:29
Yeah found it http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2010-06-18
It's dated 2008 though so maybe just a patent?
It's dated 2008 though so maybe just a patent?
Comment by Anvh posted on pentax ff camera? at 21/06/2010 - 19:10
Don wrote:
that fits pentax full frame lenses....
This could only happen in dreams.that fits pentax full frame lenses....
The register distance (distance from lens to sensor) must be the same or else you lose some focus range. Since the register distance must be the same that means the image the lens make is too small to cover the whole sensor.
The best you can do is specially make lenses for it and use an adaptor so that you can use 645 or 67 lenses.
Gwyn wrote:
Well they have taken out a patent on two 4/3rds lenses......
Pentax or Hoya?Well they have taken out a patent on two 4/3rds lenses......
Comment by Anvh posted on pentax ff camera? at 21/06/2010 - 18:59
petemasty wrote:
I reckpn i 'll need advice on a good plug-in monitor chaps.
Here you go https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/new-monitors-20190I reckpn i 'll need advice on a good plug-in monitor chaps.
Comment by Anvh posted on Laptop Screen at 20/06/2010 - 21:52
Ken no such thing on the K10D
Comment by Anvh posted on White Balance Fine Tuning. at 20/06/2010 - 19:12
Hyram wrote:
How do people get paid for writing such material :
As long as there are people buying these magazines.How do people get paid for writing such material :
Comment by Anvh posted on Useless Articles at 20/06/2010 - 19:08
johnriley wrote:
Oh really?Quote:
The WB settings like Daylight, Tungsten, ect. are not fixed numbers but it limits the range of the AWB
You can switch this feature off and have fixed values if you want to, at least on the K20D.The WB settings like Daylight, Tungsten, ect. are not fixed numbers but it limits the range of the AWB
How is the option called I couldn't find it on the K10D
Comment by Anvh posted on White Balance Fine Tuning. at 20/06/2010 - 15:57
gartmore wrote:
4500K doesn't seem right at all to me, I would have guessed at around 5000 to 5500K but I've just check my K20 and it is giving a Flash WB of 5000K, I wonder why yours is different?
The WB settings like Daylight, Tungsten, ect. are not fixed numbers but it limits the range of the AWB.4500K doesn't seem right at all to me, I would have guessed at around 5000 to 5500K but I've just check my K20 and it is giving a Flash WB of 5000K, I wonder why yours is different?
Comment by Anvh posted on White Balance Fine Tuning. at 20/06/2010 - 15:37
George Lazarette wrote:
I do not think it would save me any appreciable time to shoot JPEGs, and doing so would give me less room for manoeuvre when I get the exposure wrong.
G
Same here, certainly when you shoot on manual during a sport match when there is constant lighting. With some luck you could do all your photos in one go terje-l wrote:
I understand wadna's point quite well. It is the total that makes the result. To shoot RAW you do need post processing. So it doen not matter which link in the chain is the weaker. In a given setup, shooting RAW is more time-consuming than shooting JPEG.
My set-up is Silkypix Pro, and RAW files from the camera. I can process a batch of files very quickly, and then leave the computer to output them to JPEG in its own time. I don't generally do anything else to them.I understand wadna's point quite well. It is the total that makes the result. To shoot RAW you do need post processing. So it doen not matter which link in the chain is the weaker. In a given setup, shooting RAW is more time-consuming than shooting JPEG.
I do not think it would save me any appreciable time to shoot JPEGs, and doing so would give me less room for manoeuvre when I get the exposure wrong.
G
wadna wrote:
You thought you read something I didn't say.
Depends on how you read it.Anvh wrote:
But that's your limitation then and not that of a camera which I thought it was
"I use RAW all the time for the flexibility & what I can get out of a file but at sport on 5fps I'm inclined to go with jpg."But that's your limitation then and not that of a camera which I thought it was
You thought you read something I didn't say.
I thought you said you where inclined to shoot with JPG or else you couldn't get the 5fps.
Comment by Anvh posted on J.Peg or Raw at 20/06/2010 - 15:33
But that's your limitation then and not that of a camera which I thought it was
Comment by Anvh posted on J.Peg or Raw at 19/06/2010 - 23:29
Buying to order was once an option but I believe all production has now ceased
Also the DA 16-45 but we already knew that, the surprise is that the DFA 100mm is also on the discontinued.
link