All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 02/07/2010 - 21:28
careful not to get your 4/3rd's mixed up
Micro is also for EVIL and my intentions where for APS-C DSLR solely to get faster lenses for it and a slightly smaller camera.
Comment by Anvh posted on Why use a 135format lens mount? at 02/07/2010 - 21:26
the neighbourhood has gone mad. Fireworks, vuvuzelas, air horns, car horns.
Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 02/07/2010 - 18:51
http://lightroomkillertips.com/2008/video-tip-smart-collections/
Comment by Anvh posted on Hard disk structure for organising photos at 02/07/2010 - 18:48
The DA*50-135 could most likely be redesigned as a f/2 lens and the DA*60-250 maybe even a f/2.8 if there is some stress in it. The lens might become more expensive because larger glass is needed but at least it's possible to make such lenses.
I think many don't Like the 4/3th because the sensor is smaller but I could be wrong though.
At least it would be interesting to see what such a camera would do if they would bring it out with two f/2 zooms and a f/0.8 or f/0.9 normal prime lens and the capability to use adapters.
I already said it on page 2 but if they could make the mount so that they could make adapters to fit most of the current camera brands it could get very interesting.
Canon or Nikon would off course never officially support the adapter but if they could back engineer it like Sigma does.
Comment by Anvh posted on Why use a 135format lens mount? at 02/07/2010 - 18:39
I was first planning to buy the K100D super at that time but I know I wanted to have the manual controls the K10D offered and went for that.
The first months certainly were taunting and I had a lot off bad photos then but you really learn how to use the camera and modes like P, Av, Tv really help you along the way and it's pretty clear what the camera is doing because you've almost direct feedback since you can see your photos on the LCD screen.
So for photographic matters all cameras are just as taunting and the interface and all the technical options are something that comes very quickly with most of the younger generation.
Just give them the Magic Lantern Guide with the camera. You can see that guide as an extensive Manual with a good or at least better explanation off all the options and how to use the camera.
I bought one with my K10D and it has being a life saver a couple of times and of course he must become a member of this forum, that's also super helpful.
Comment by Anvh posted on K20D or K7 at 02/07/2010 - 17:42
When I have done some PP, I either print it or convert them to JPG for the web but those converted JPG'S get thrown a way when uploaded so I only have the RAW files in the end.
The cataloguing is done on date since I doesn't do anything professional but I can imaging I would simply name a folder to something easily recognisable when uploading to Lightroom.
Lightroom has this system in it to catalogue so why not use it?
Here is an article about cataloguing with Lightroom, I think the ones using the program recognise themselves. link
Comment by Anvh posted on Hard disk structure for organising photos at 02/07/2010 - 17:33
Ah I see what you are getting at now - the shorter distance gives you faster lenses. I couldn't see what great advantage shaving a few mm off a 50-135 would be! I still think it would be better to design better glass (especially more F2.8, no more F4 please...) in the first place than chasing ultra-low F-stops.
The DA*50-135 could most likely be redesigned as a f/2 lens and the DA*60-250 maybe even a f/2.8 if there is some stress in it. The lens might become more expensive because larger glass is needed but at least it's possible to make such lenses.
Or even better, go FF then you can gather even more light in the first place... (runs, hides...:lol. More seriously, things like an electronic shutter & fully EVIL would allow you to significantly reduce the registration distance, but this is still a few years away.
The electronic shutter is already in some DSLR camera's I believe, one of the Nikons had it.
EVIL cameras surely can get very fast lenses and that's one of the reasons they adapt the mount as well I believe. I believe the reasonable limit for f-number was f/0.7 and They can reach that with the current EVIL cameras.
Sadly I'm not a huge fan of the digital viewfinder, they still have a long way to go before they are suitable to fully replace the optical viewfinder.
Funny enough Olympus had more than twice the market share in 2008 than Pentax
There's a lot of good things said in this thread which doesn't directly tackle your question, but does show why a new mount is a Bad Idea (tm) especially when you look at the failures of the past.
Anyway, we should know at/by Photokina what Pentax is up to - the only thing that is definate is that at least 1/3 of Pentax users will very vocally hate whichever direction they go (stay where they are, go FF, EVIL, m4/3, etc etc...)
And let's be honest, EVIL is probably the kind that will replace DSLR over time, not now and not over 10 years but it will happen most likely so I only hope that they wait with their EVIL camera till they are a bit more mature and can really compete with the DSLR market.
Comment by Anvh posted on Why use a 135format lens mount? at 02/07/2010 - 17:20
Sonic Drive motor(pentax).
here is the glossary http://www.pentax.co.uk/en/Photo_Lenses_Glossary.html
Pentax is using the K-mount for their lens mount so every lens with such a mount can be used.
Comment by Anvh posted on Lens Question at 02/07/2010 - 09:16
The Focus screen does have an effect on exposure metering though.
John already said the rest.
Comment by Anvh posted on Focus issues. at 01/07/2010 - 21:35

