All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on portrait lighting kits. at 30/07/2010 - 21:16
Like this link
Comment by Anvh posted on How would a 71,3 gigapixel looks like? at 30/07/2010 - 21:02
dougf8 wrote:
Still think we should have it as a comp subject.
On the Dutch forum there they have a kind of chainlink with this.Still think we should have it as a comp subject.
Someone post a photo and if someone guess it then he/she will post a photo and so on.
Comment by Anvh posted on What am I ?? at 30/07/2010 - 20:51
Mannesty wrote:
If you buy one because you are going to use it regularly, and it lasts 2 years, you have no worries.
I've some luck, just checked the law about that here and it seems I've many more years then that.If you buy one because you are going to use it regularly, and it lasts 2 years, you have no worries.
They look here at the;
price
type of product
the store you bought add
what the salesman has said
what the manufacture says
Since the 16-50 isn't cheap, lenses normally last a life time and the lens comes from a specialist camera-store I'm settled.
I think it's worth checking the.
Don't forget the minimum warranty here in Europe is 2 years so don't let you throw yourself off with 1 year deals.
Reuben0 wrote:
Auto-focusing the lens via the screw-drive on a body that didn't have SDM (the *istD in this case) and then putting it back on my K20D fixed the problem. It's been fine ever since.
Worth a try if you have an older body (even an old AF film body).
Can't recommend it since you can never be sure it's the SDM motor that stopped working or if there is something wrong inside the AF system.Auto-focusing the lens via the screw-drive on a body that didn't have SDM (the *istD in this case) and then putting it back on my K20D fixed the problem. It's been fine ever since.
Worth a try if you have an older body (even an old AF film body).
If for example an axle is misaligned you would only wrecked the lens more.
Comment by Anvh posted on SDM 16-50 lens focusing not working at 30/07/2010 - 20:48
whelmed wrote:
Not to pollute the thread but this a very nice photo I think.
It just shows how complex lenses really are and it looks like the lens is sucking in the image.
To say at least something usefully.
Have this lens for almost a year now.
It's a lovely lens a bit slow on the focus but the rest of it is just very nice, it's my most used lens.
Comment by Anvh posted on For Sale: DA* 50-135mm at 30/07/2010 - 20:31
flossie wrote:
You can adjust exposure in raw, but it will only move the "central" exposure of your picture, it won't be able to stop clipped highlights or lowlights. You will still need to bracket if you are unsure of exposure!
You sure this is what Cambridge in colour has to say about it. linkYou can adjust exposure in raw, but it will only move the "central" exposure of your picture, it won't be able to stop clipped highlights or lowlights. You will still need to bracket if you are unsure of exposure!
Comment by Anvh posted on Ditch RAW+Jpeg bracteted for RAW alone? at 30/07/2010 - 20:21
Smeggypants wrote:
IOW, I'm not interested in video features. I want to capture the moment. Stills of historic events are much more poignant, enigmatic and charismatic than any video/film newsreel.
Which is why we are all into photography right?
Yes that's why but for a record a video holds more information about the event or a person so they fill each other up quite nicely. IOW, I'm not interested in video features. I want to capture the moment. Stills of historic events are much more poignant, enigmatic and charismatic than any video/film newsreel.
Which is why we are all into photography right?
Comment by Anvh posted on Which one next? at 30/07/2010 - 20:08
davidtrout wrote:
Judging by a poll vote means you get no feed back.
David
Actually if you see the voting thread you will see some did get some feedback from other members and I'm sure if someone who entered asked a question that those will be answered by other members.Judging by a poll vote means you get no feed back.
David
It's the hope that feedback will come from a lot of people so you get views from different angles.
Comment by Anvh posted on Voting competition #1 - Cycles at 29/07/2010 - 17:16
It's quite simple.
Send photo to the mail address or upload to a imagetank and share the link > photo gets uploaded together with all the other entries and showed here once the start.
That's it really the rest is pretty self explaining like the theme and the voting.
Will send everyone who entered a reply when I've processed their photos so that they know I'm working on them.
I'll try to do that within two days I'm now quite busy so will do the ones that have entered this week this weekend so if you have send me something but you don't get a reply this week something went wrong.
Send photo to the mail address or upload to a imagetank and share the link > photo gets uploaded together with all the other entries and showed here once the start.
That's it really the rest is pretty self explaining like the theme and the voting.
Will send everyone who entered a reply when I've processed their photos so that they know I'm working on them.
I'll try to do that within two days I'm now quite busy so will do the ones that have entered this week this weekend so if you have send me something but you don't get a reply this week something went wrong.
Comment by Anvh posted on Voting competition #1 - Cycles at 29/07/2010 - 17:11
Mike-P wrote:
My post was a little dig at Tony ... I think a mobile that can take pics and video is a great idea.
Wouldn't it be easier to make a camera that can call?My post was a little dig at Tony ... I think a mobile that can take pics and video is a great idea.
If you've video mode on your camera you already have a microphone and a speaker in it, all it need is a GSM antennae
Comment by Anvh posted on Which one next? at 27/07/2010 - 18:54
This was suggested to me for lights and I thought they looked good. www.photodeals.co.uk
Here is the suggestion. link