All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Losing EXIF data at 31/08/2010 - 17:07
golfdiesel wrote:
Well, not exactly. The only warranty that is "demanded" by law is 6 months.
After that there is the regulation that a device should work without problems for a reasonable time. For a laptop you could argue that it should work for at least 3 years. For a washing machine you expect at least 6 or 7 years.
you sure I thought 2 years?Well, not exactly. The only warranty that is "demanded" by law is 6 months.
After that there is the regulation that a device should work without problems for a reasonable time. For a laptop you could argue that it should work for at least 3 years. For a washing machine you expect at least 6 or 7 years.
With the rest that's indeed right, I got a list with which was expectable. For a normal notebook it was 2 years and a high-end one 3 years as far as I remember.
Comment by Anvh posted on Which one would you choose? at 31/08/2010 - 16:06
I think no one dared to respond.
Good look with your purchase, I hope they work well for you.
Good look with your purchase, I hope they work well for you.
Comment by Anvh posted on Cheap ebay studio flash kits at 31/08/2010 - 15:40
Would be interesting to see more entries
Comment by Anvh posted on Voting competition #2 - Patina, Patination, Signs of Ageing at 31/08/2010 - 14:40
Yep same here.
Quote:
3.2
- Additional camera support for several new camera models including the Panasonic DMC-LX5, Sony NEX-5 and Pentax 645D
- Numerous corrections for issues introduced in Lightroom 3.0
- Direct publishing to Facebook and over 120 new lens profiles
Current version : 3.0 (build 677000)
Seems almost all the Adobe programs has an update 3.2
- Additional camera support for several new camera models including the Panasonic DMC-LX5, Sony NEX-5 and Pentax 645D
- Numerous corrections for issues introduced in Lightroom 3.0
- Direct publishing to Facebook and over 120 new lens profiles
Current version : 3.0 (build 677000)
Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax Lens Profiles in Lightroom 3.2 at 31/08/2010 - 13:44
techno-terminator wrote:
I suspect that there are many who would look at the various Pentax Sites and the other makers ones too - and then make a choice.
I don't know, not me at least. Only looked at the Pentax site after I bought the K10D to see if there are firmware updates.I suspect that there are many who would look at the various Pentax Sites and the other makers ones too - and then make a choice.
What I did read was reviews online but never visited one of the companies website.
For lenses the same thing and in the store tested them on how smooth they worked, if they function correctly and that's it, common practice I believe.
What about you and the other members, was the website an important factor for deciding which camera to get?
TT didn't you already start an almost the same thread once before?
I at least rather have them focus on equipment than bring out an app or buying advice.
But Pentax has this though. link
a book for the 645D link
Yearbooks link
Instruction books link link
Juggling balls for when you're bored link
Remember these? link
You're just living in the wrong country, sorry
ps. didn't knew Pentax still made the 67II and the 645NII
The FA 50 f/1,4 & FA 35 f/2 are also still made...
I at least rather have them focus on equipment than bring out an app or buying advice.
But Pentax has this though. link
a book for the 645D link
Yearbooks link
Instruction books link link
Juggling balls for when you're bored link
Remember these? link
You're just living in the wrong country, sorry
ps. didn't knew Pentax still made the 67II and the 645NII
The FA 50 f/1,4 & FA 35 f/2 are also still made...
You do have backpacks like these link
It has a lower compartment big enough for your camera gear I think, I wished Lowe would make some camera inserts that fit in such a bag easily
Here is a review of one of those backpacks link
It has a lower compartment big enough for your camera gear I think, I wished Lowe would make some camera inserts that fit in such a bag easily
Here is a review of one of those backpacks link
Comment by Anvh posted on A question of size at 30/08/2010 - 20:39
No offence taken Simon.
Lowe does make "real" backpacks for hiking under the Lowe Alpine name so the question is how much of that do you see back in the camera backpacks from Lowe Pro that are meant for day hikes.
I've tried the Primus and that one does seem to offer the support needed but still like you said a real packback is better I think better.
The only problem is with getting a packback you suggest is that the sizes for day hikes only have one compartment so how do you keep your wet cloths, food, water separated from the camera gear?
I've a good day backpack and played with the idea but never found a solution to the problem.
Lowe does make "real" backpacks for hiking under the Lowe Alpine name so the question is how much of that do you see back in the camera backpacks from Lowe Pro that are meant for day hikes.
I've tried the Primus and that one does seem to offer the support needed but still like you said a real packback is better I think better.
The only problem is with getting a packback you suggest is that the sizes for day hikes only have one compartment so how do you keep your wet cloths, food, water separated from the camera gear?
I've a good day backpack and played with the idea but never found a solution to the problem.
Comment by Anvh posted on A question of size at 30/08/2010 - 18:51
Doubt it, Pentax didn't adopt the NX10 either (is it either or neither?).
Comment by Anvh posted on Dear Pentax.... at 30/08/2010 - 18:33
The "Ignore EXIF profile tag" is how photoshop should handle file when it opens them if you've that checked it will ignore the colour-space that's embedded inside the Metadata when you open a file and I don't want that.
As far as I can tell it has nothing to do how it saves a file.