Anvh

Joined: 4th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Anvh
MrCynical wrote:
I was under the impression from the discussion of the patent Hoya got that the DC motors are an entirely new technology, and more than feasible as a replacement for SDM.

Also, I can't imagine that the new 18-135 requires less motor torque to focus than, say, the DA*55 prime.
New technology
The DC is simply a brush-less direct current motor, nothing new about those.
I do think though that Pentax might be the first one to use them in their lenses.

The DA*55 is older then the DA 18-135, also the DA*55 is f/1.4 so probably the elements that move for focusing can be heavier, don't know about the design of the DA 18-135 so can't say.
Also the SDM is more efficient as far as i know.

If you want to read link

Comment by Anvh posted on Sigma 85mm F1.4 EX DG HSM available for Pentax at 17/10/2010 - 13:29

Anvh
I like how vibrant your photos are.
Only 6277 doesn't work for me, it's the composition, the stones with the moss are to heavy in the frame.
And 6257 looks a bit dull compared to the rest.

Comment by Anvh posted on Cleveleys... life's a beach! at 17/10/2010 - 13:24

Anvh
Church
Comment Image

Comment by Anvh posted on Post something similar at 17/10/2010 - 13:13

Anvh
We already knew about the Metz 50 and the Metz 58 but there is now also a Metz 44.
http://www.metz.de/en/photo-electronics/mecablitz-models/system-flash-units/meca...

It looks like a downgraded Metz 48 and with simpler controls, it might be a winner for beginners.

Comment by Anvh posted on New Metz 44 at 17/10/2010 - 12:28

Anvh

Comment by Anvh posted on Metz 48 af-1 DOES NOT FIRE at 17/10/2010 - 12:22

Anvh
second-hand DA 16-45 maybe?
Won't be cheaper then £100 but it's probably the cheapest you can get.

Comment by Anvh posted on Is there a cheap way to go wider than 18mm? at 17/10/2010 - 12:21

Anvh
pentaxian450 wrote:
Anvh wrote:

If it's too sharp it's quite easy to soften the photo in post processing so it's better to have a lens that's too sharp then too soft imho
I'd rather have it right in camera. The more time I spend in front of the computer (unlike you:wink, the less time I have to take pictures.
And you think that takes a lot of time?
With light room you select all the photos that need to be soften and then slide one slider.. done, in a matter of seconds you can have soften all your photos.
I think it takes more time to change lenses all the time

Comment by Anvh posted on Best Focal Length for Portraits? at 17/10/2010 - 12:19

Anvh
Too bad

Comment by Anvh posted on K-5 in Canada. at 17/10/2010 - 00:05

Anvh
Metal round thing in front of a blue sky
Comment Image

Comment by Anvh posted on Post something similar at 16/10/2010 - 23:57

Anvh
First, second, third, fourth and fifth.
Comment Image


I really over did this photo

Comment by Anvh posted on Post something similar at 16/10/2010 - 23:39

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo