All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Rules Discusion at 07/11/2010 - 15:42
And you say like that is easy
Comment by Anvh posted on J R Review of KR at 06/11/2010 - 15:36
Is the video function change from the K-X, i believe they use the same sensor right?
Comment by Anvh posted on J R Review of KR at 06/11/2010 - 14:39
hkwiles wrote:
I am aware of this one John, does this mean a third up the frame ? or guestimating a third of the way from me infinity lol.
The first one.I am aware of this one John, does this mean a third up the frame ? or guestimating a third of the way from me infinity lol.
DOF extend further to the back then to the front.
Comment by Anvh posted on Hyperfocal Distance with Modern lens at 06/11/2010 - 14:38
The current ones or most of them work with active shutters and the glasses are heavy and expensive.
polarized glasses are much cheaper and lighter, i hope you see them more, most cinema's use those glasses.
And there are already techniques that don't require glasses but they are mighty expensive.
But the next best thing is already being developed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbk5_XEZ3DQ
polarized glasses are much cheaper and lighter, i hope you see them more, most cinema's use those glasses.
And there are already techniques that don't require glasses but they are mighty expensive.
But the next best thing is already being developed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbk5_XEZ3DQ
montyaus wrote:
I can not see any need for rules, guidelines have been established it is a good way for a friendly forum, if you were to have rules,in black and white, will we have forum PCs, that will bar you,fine you or confiscate your camera.
I wanted some rules or guideline because it seemed the term common sense is used discriminate.I can not see any need for rules, guidelines have been established it is a good way for a friendly forum, if you were to have rules,in black and white, will we have forum PCs, that will bar you,fine you or confiscate your camera.
But that doesn't seem to be the case.
Comment by Anvh posted on Rules Discusion at 06/11/2010 - 14:27
johnriley wrote:
Perhaps I'm explaining it badly, so I'll try again. This forum is called Pentax User and is for Pentax users and Pentax images. Sometimes exceptions occur, but that is at the discretion of Pentax User and common sense.
I got the first part but the way you explain it at first looked like there was no exceptions at all.Perhaps I'm explaining it badly, so I'll try again. This forum is called Pentax User and is for Pentax users and Pentax images. Sometimes exceptions occur, but that is at the discretion of Pentax User and common sense.
Comment by Anvh posted on Rules Discusion at 06/11/2010 - 14:22
Alan this is what I'm talking about. link
Gareth was there with other forum members but he is put a bit on the side-line only because he didn't shoot his photo with a Pentax, i found that quite disappointing.
Gareth was there with other forum members but he is put a bit on the side-line only because he didn't shoot his photo with a Pentax, i found that quite disappointing.
Comment by Anvh posted on Rules Discusion at 06/11/2010 - 14:19
johnriley wrote:
also, the picture Stefan is so aggrieved about was actually removed because it wasn't Stefan's picture and the non-Pentax part was secondary to that.
John Like I said I actually don't want to discuss this here and it's already all done.also, the picture Stefan is so aggrieved about was actually removed because it wasn't Stefan's picture and the non-Pentax part was secondary to that.
And as you know the photo had a license that allowed distribution and copying of the photo so if you're saying now that the photo is actually allowed even though it isn't made with a Pentax i wonder why you didn't say so earlier.
fatspider wrote:
nothing in the rules says you have to own a Pentax to join
Who said that?nothing in the rules says you have to own a Pentax to join
I only said that I think it would be nice if forum members that also have a camera from another brand are allowed to show some of their photos. Nothing like your doomsday scenario
Comment by Anvh posted on Rules Discusion at 06/11/2010 - 14:04
gartmore wrote:
I dont think there was any need to start this discussion, common sense has always applied.
Common sense from who and when are you allowed to post a photo and when not... I dont think there was any need to start this discussion, common sense has always applied.
My latest collision with John, I thought the photo with the train was perfectly acceptable because that was the discussion about and someone else had two months ago placed a photo on the forum about the ICE accident Eschede, Germany as part of joke and that one was allowed...
That's why i want clear rules or at least some indication where the line is.
Comment by Anvh posted on Rules Discusion at 06/11/2010 - 13:33
I really want a place on the forum where the guide lines are written down.
The several discussion that has happened clearly shows those guidelines aren't well know.
And even John has explain the guideline wrong to me.
What is so hard to write it down and make it a sticky somewhere so there is no confusion about it any more?