All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on K5 and Silkypix at 09/11/2010 - 15:34
Alan where do I compare them with, you call them comparison shots after all?
The higher ISO do look soft though.
The higher ISO do look soft though.
Comment by Anvh posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 09/11/2010 - 15:32
And it looks good too and you can get it in different colours, quite funny how successful that is.
K10D wrote:
As mentioned above with the reference to speakers, there's more to an image than a sensor. That said, there are those that think CCD are better than CMOS?
I'm one of them, for lower ISO which i mostly shoot at the CCD offers more uniform photos and higher dynamic range.As mentioned above with the reference to speakers, there's more to an image than a sensor. That said, there are those that think CCD are better than CMOS?
Comment by Anvh posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 09/11/2010 - 00:16
Don wrote:
that is sorta like thinking the speakers are all that matters when producing sound...
Whit CMOS chips most of the hardware needed is already baked into the chip, the output of CMOS is therefore also digital and not analogue like CCD. That's why I doubt there can be such a huge difference.Anvh wrote:
The strangest thing is that the D7000 and the K5 use the same sensor, there can never be so much difference in it if they are RAW files.
seems to be more to noise than just the sensor... there are a lot of other electronics under the hood as well...The strangest thing is that the D7000 and the K5 use the same sensor, there can never be so much difference in it if they are RAW files.
that is sorta like thinking the speakers are all that matters when producing sound...
Comment by Anvh posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 08/11/2010 - 21:52
Comment by Anvh posted on A question of size at 08/11/2010 - 21:03
The strangest thing is that the D7000 and the K5 use the same sensor, there can never be so much difference in it if they are RAW files.
Comment by Anvh posted on So how good is the K-5 sensor at 08/11/2010 - 20:52
Thank you all again ^^
Alan you can joke all you want
I'm still in discussion about what happened with one of the mod, I've no idea how that will unfold.
Peter Bargh is now explaining the "pentax only" rule to me but he explain it differently then how it is used currently so i've also no idea about how that one will go.
Alan you can joke all you want
I'm still in discussion about what happened with one of the mod, I've no idea how that will unfold.
Peter Bargh is now explaining the "pentax only" rule to me but he explain it differently then how it is used currently so i've also no idea about how that one will go.
Alrighty... worried about nothing it seems
Making mistakes isn't a bad thing but not learning from them is.
Pentaxophile wrote:
He probably meant pain like a nagging toothache or someone constantly drilling into the wall next door!
yeah i'm good with that He probably meant pain like a nagging toothache or someone constantly drilling into the wall next door!
Pentaxophile wrote:
it doesn't mean anything if you have to ask people to PM you to explain why they feel they need one
I want to know what i did wrong that i hurted them because that wasn't my intention.it doesn't mean anything if you have to ask people to PM you to explain why they feel they need one
Making mistakes isn't a bad thing but not learning from them is.
The latest thread from me was locked and Ken said there that members have complained to me and about me and that I caused pain.
I really want to make personally apologies to the ones that are hurt so if you can contact me (here or PM) and say how I hurt you so that I can make a apology that would be appreciated.
With kind regards,
I really want to make personally apologies to the ones that are hurt so if you can contact me (here or PM) and say how I hurt you so that I can make a apology that would be appreciated.
With kind regards,
Interesting that it supports 645D RAW already, but not K-5 or K-r.